Cortés O1,
Martinez AM2,
Cañon J1,
Sevane N1,
Gama LT3,
Ginja C4,5,
Landi V2,
Zaragoza P6,
Carolino N7,
Vicente A7,8,
Sponenberg P9,
Delgado JV2.
- 1Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Madrid, Spain.
- 2Departamento de Genética, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
- 3CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
- 4Ce3C-Centro de Ecologia, Evolução e Alterações Ambientais, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
- 5CIBIO-InBIO-Centro
de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do
Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal.
- 6Laboratorio de Genética Bioquímica, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
- 7Instituto
Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. Unidade
Estratégica de Investigação e Serviços de Biotecnologia e Recursos
Genéticos Polo de Investigação da Fonte Boa, Vale de Santarém, Portugal.
- 8Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Santarém, Vale de Santarém, Portugal.
- 9Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Abstract
Criollo pig breeds are descendants from pigs brought to the American continent starting with Columbus second trip in 1493. Pigs
currently play a key role in social economy and community cultural
identity in Latin America. The aim of this study was to establish
conservation priorities among a comprehensive group of Criollo pig
breeds based on a set of 24 microsatellite markers and using different
criteria. Spain and Portugal
pig breeds, wild boar populations of different European geographic
origins and commercial pig breeds were included in the analysis as
potential genetic influences in the development of Criollo pig breeds.
Different methods, differing in the weight given to within- and
between-breed genetic variability, were used in order to estimate the
contribution of each breed to global genetic diversity. As expected, the
partial contribution to total heterozygosity gave high priority to
Criollo pig breeds, whereas Weitzman procedures prioritized Iberian
Peninsula breeds. With the combined within- and between-breed
approaches, different conservation priorities were achieved. The Core
Set methodologies highly prioritized Criollo pig breeds (Cr. Boliviano,
Cr. Pacifico, Cr. Cubano and Cr. Guadalupe). However, weighing the
between- and within-breed components with FST and 1-FST, respectively,
resulted in higher contributions of Iberian breeds. In spite of the
different conservation priorities according to the methodology used,
other factors in addition to genetic information also need to be
considered in conservation programmes, such as the economic, cultural or
historical value of the breeds involved.