twitter

Tuesday, 15 November 2016

Marijuana, phytocannabinoids, the endocannabinoid system, and male fertility

. 2015 Nov; 32(11): 1575–1588.
Published online 2015 Aug 16. doi:  10.1007/s10815-015-0553-8
PMCID: PMC4651943


Stefan S. du Plessis, Ashok Agarwal,corresponding author and Arun Syriac
  • 1Division of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa. ssdp@sun.ac.za.
  • 2American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 10681 Carnegie Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. ssdp@sun.ac.za.
  • 3American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 10681 Carnegie Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. agarwaa@ccf.org.
  • 4American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 10681 Carnegie Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. drsyriac@gmail.com.

Abstract

Marijuana has the highest consumption rate among all of the illicit drugs used in the USA, and its popularity as both a recreational and medicinal drug is increasing especially among men of reproductive age. Male factor infertility is on the increase, and the exposure to the cannabinoid compounds released by marijuana could be a contributing cause. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is deeply involved in the complex regulation of male reproduction through the endogenous release of endocannabinoids and binding to cannabinoid receptors. Disturbing the delicate balance of the ECS due to marijuana use can negatively impact reproductive potential. Various in vivo and in vitro studies have reported on the empirical role that marijuana plays in disrupting the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis, spermatogenesis, and sperm function such as motility, capacitation, and the acrosome reaction. In this review, we highlight the latest evidence regarding the effect of marijuana use on male fertility and also provide a detailed insight into the ECS and its significance in the male reproductive system.
Keywords: Male infertility, Marijuana, Spermatozoa, Endocannabinoid system, Testosterone, LH, FSH, Estrogen, Sperm motility, Sperm viability

Introduction

Once a social taboo, medical, spiritual, and even recreational marijuana use is now increasingly accepted. Lobbying for the legalization of marijuana is at an unprecedented peak in the USA and becoming a global phenomenon. To date, medical marijuana use has been legalized in 23 states and the District of Columbia in the USA, while it has already been legalized for recreational use in four states. In Europe, and in specific the Netherlands, physicians have been able to prescribe cannabis preparations to patients for the last 10 years []. In Germany, medicinal use of cannabis are only granted for special cases while in Italy, cannabis are freely available to patients with a prescription since 2014. Proponents argue that it is an effective treatment for symptoms of patients with serious health issues, amongst other cancer-related pain and epilepsy. However, opponents maintain that it has several unwanted side effects that overshadow the beneficial effects and that too few valid scientific studies have been performed to support these claims. One specific area of concern is the effect of marijuana on the male reproductive system as epidemiological and experimental studies have shown that episodic marijuana use has long been associated with decreased testosterone release, reduced sperm counts, motility, viability, morphology, and inhibition of the acrosome reaction in humans. All of these factors can have drastic implications in the long term with regards to impairing male reproduction as well as negatively impacting the offspring [–].
Cannabis is undoubtedly the most widely cultivated, trafficked, and abused illicit drug in the world. Approximately 147 million people, or 2.5 % of the world population, consume cannabis []. According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, marijuana is the most commonly used among all illicit drugs in the USA. It is estimated that 80 % of the 24.6 million illicit drug users (i.e., 19.8 million) in the USA uses marijuana, with 64.7 % being marijuana-only users. Marijuana users are predominantly male. It is furthermore evident from the survey that marijuana use was more prevalent among men who are of reproductive age []. All of these facts combined are more than enough reason to raise awareness and debate about the effects and safety surrounding marijuana use.
Cannabis, commonly referred to as marijuana, is a product of the dried leaves and flowers from the plant Cannabis sativa. It is consumed for either its psychoactive (relaxation and mild euphoria) or physiological effects. Upon consumption, it acts via releasing of cannabinoid compounds that bind to cannabinoid receptors which form part of the endocannabinoid system (ECS). Numerous roles have been ascribed to the ECS, but it is known to also play a very important and specific role in the control of male reproduction []. An understanding of this system is therefore fundamental to be able to fully grasp the effect of exogenous cannabinoids (phytocannabinoids) on male reproductive function.
In the present paper, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the latest evidence regarding the effect of marijuana use on male infertility; however, this cannot be done in isolation as this drug exerts its effects via the ECS. We furthermore aim to also provide broad insight into the complicated ECS, its involvement, and its importance in the male reproductive system.

General pharmacobiology of marijuana

Marijuana consists of dried leaves and flowers from the plant Cannabis sativa and is also known under numerous street names, including weed, pot, grass, 420, hashish, joint, dope, and many more. It releases the psychoactive cannabinoid compound called tetrahydrocannabinol, with Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) being much more abundant and active than Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol []. It contains several other cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN), but these are not as abundant and their psychoactive effects not as well-expressed as that of THC [, ]. Only through sufficient heating or dehydration the tetrahydrocannabinolic acid contained in marijuana can undergo decarboxylation and form the psychoactive THC [, ]. As previously mentioned, it exerts its effects via the ECS through binding to the cannabinoid receptors.
Cannabis has varying psychoactive and physiological effects when consumed, depending on the strain, form (herb, resin, oil), and method (e.g., smoking, ingestion, tablets, tinctures, etc.) by which it is consumed []. The psychoactive effects of marijuana include that of stimulant, depressant, and hallucinogen leading to change of perception and mood. Physiologically, it lowers blood pressure and increases heart rate, while it also impairs memory (short-term and working), concentration, and psychomotor coordination []. Other chronic health effects ascribe to marijuana use include airway injury, respiratory inflammation, bronchitis, and mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. The materia medica on marijuana as a therapeutic for nausea and glaucoma, a stimulant of appetite as well as an analgesic in advanced stages of disease has been well documented through several controlled trials and studies [, ]. However, the health consequences of marijuana warrants further investigation.

The endocannabinoid system—a brief overview

The ECS consists of the endogenous endocannabinoid ligands, their congeners, the biosynthetic and hydrolyzing enzymes involved in the metabolism of these ligands, their transporter proteins, and receptors [, ]. The ECS is present in both mammalian and non-mammalian vertebrates and appear to be an evolutionary conserved master system. Endocannabinoids are found to be widely dispersed in human tissues such as the central nervous system, peripheral nerves, leukocytes, spleen, uterus, and testicles []. It must therefore play a role in a number of physiological processes and appears to be deeply involved in the control of reproductive function [, ]. Please refer to Fasano et al. [] for a comprehensive overview of the ECS.

The endocannabinoids

Endocannabinoids are endogenous lipids that mimic various actions of THC []. As of yet, four endocannabinoids have been characterized, i.e., arachidonoylglycerol ether, virodhamine, N-arachidonoylethanolamine or anandamide (AEA), and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). AEA and 2-AG are the best characterized members that belong to this family of biolipids, and both are regarded as the main endocannabinoids in the human body [, ]. They act on the cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) and therefore mimic some of the biological actions of cannabinoids (THC) originating from cannabis/marijuana. Interestingly, it is also believed that these endocannabinoids are not stored intracellularly but rather produced from membrane phospholipid precursors through the activation of specific phospholipases and are released on demand [, ]. Their extracellular bioavailability is subjected to an unsubstantiated endocannabinoid membrane transporter (EMT) []. These endocannabinoids can be synthesized and inactivated independently, while they also act promiscuously (i.e., do not only act on cannabinoid receptors). This allows for a high degree of differential flexibility of their actions, thereby making the ECS a highly complex system to understand [].

AEA

Phospholipase D catalyzes the release of AEA through the cleavage of a phospholipid precursor []. AEA acts as a partial agonist for the cannabinoid receptors, being more selective for CB1 []. However, it also binds to the transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) or type-1 vanilloid receptor [, ]. It is metabolized, after cellular uptake by EMT, inside the cell to ethanolamine and arachidonic acid (AA) by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) which is membrane bound [].

2-AG

2-AG belongs to the monoacylglycerol (MAG) family of endocannabinoids. It acts as a potent equal agonist for both CB1 and CB2 receptors; however, it does not act on the TRPV1 receptor [, ]. Various biosynthetic pathways (e.g., phospholipase C-dependent and independent) are responsible for the production of 2-AG []. The transport of 2-AG across the cell membrane may be mediated by EMT as well. Once inside the cell, 2-AG is a substrate for the cytosolic monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) and is mostly degraded to glycerol and AA [].

The cannabinoid receptors

Two subtypes of cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) have been described as of yet, both of which belong to the family of transmembrane spanning G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) []. AEA and 2-AG bind to the extracellular site of these GPCRs []. Stimulation of these receptors can lead to either inhibition of adenylate cyclase and decreased c-AMP levels and/or inhibition of certain calcium channels, thereby reducing calcium influx [–]. Unlike most GPCRs, the cannabinoid receptors have more than one endogenous ligand. Other receptors that are stimulated by endocannabinoids have also been described.

CB1 receptors

These GPCRs are found primarily in the central nervous system [–]. It is also located in the ovary, uterine endometrium, testis, vas deferens, urinary bladder among others [, , –]. In the brain, CB1 receptors seem to be located in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus which is also the home of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) secreting neurons []. In the male reproductive system, they are located in the testis, prostate, and vas deferens [, ]. In humans, CB1 receptors are also expressed on the plasma membrane of the acrosomal region, midpiece, and on the tail of spermatozoa []. Rossato et al. [] on the other hand showed the CB1 receptor to be only present in the sperm head and midpiece, but not the tail.

CB2 receptors

CB2 receptors, which are also GPCRs, are mainly expressed in the immune system and peripheral cells as well as in neuronal cells [, ]. Initially, there was lack of clarity regarding the presence of CB2 receptors in spermatozoa, but a study conducted by Agirregoita et al. confirmed the presence of the CB2 receptor in human spermatozoa []. Here, these receptors are present in the postacrosomal region, midpiece, and tail of spermatozoa []. CB2 receptors were also found to be present on Sertoli cells [].

Other receptors

Some other receptors such as the purported CB3 receptor and non-CB1/non-CB2 receptors have also been described [, ]. The non-CB1/non-CB2 receptors include the TRPV1 receptor which is an intracellular target for AEA. However, 2-AG does not have an effect on the TRPV1 receptor []. In human spermatozoa, the TRPV1 receptor was restricted to the postacrosomal region of the sperm head []. These findings furthermore suggest an interaction between the cannabinoid and vanilloid systems []. Endocannabinoids and their congeners have also been implicated to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and thus play a role in energy homeostasis [].

The endocannabinoid system and male reproduction

The presence of the ECS has been demonstrated in various cell types that are involved in male reproduction. As previously mentioned, endocannabinoids and cannabinoid receptors have been shown to be present in testicular tissue, including Sertoli and Leydig cells as well as spermatozoa in various species from invertebrates to mammals []. It was furthermore localized in areas of the hypothalamus responsible for the production of gonadotrophic releasing hormone (GnRH) and can thus also exert a role via the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. It is therefore clear that the ECS is deeply involved in the control of the male reproductive system and function of spermatozoa.

ECS and the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis

A fully functional HPG axis is needed to properly orchestrate and maintain the process of spermatogenesis []. GnRH is released from the hypothalamus which, in turn, stimulates specific nuclei in the pituitary to synthesize and release follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). These two gonadotropins act on their respective target tissues in the gonads. Basically, FSH stimulates the Sertoli cells to support developing spermatozoa, while LH leads to the release of testosterone from Leydig cells.
The ECS has been closely associated with the HPG pathway at multiple levels as CB1 receptors are expressed in the anterior pituitary, Leydig cells and Sertoli cells. CB2 was found in Sertoli cells while other components of the ECS, such as AEA, FAAH, and EMT have also been observed in testicular tissues [, , , ]. For example, administration of AEA, which usually binds to postsynaptic CB1 receptors, decreased serum LH. This action could be prevented by a specific CB1 antagonist (SR141716) [, ]. Farkas and coworkers furthermore demonstrated that endocannabinoid activates CB1 which, in turn, inhibits spontaneous gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) release []. Postsynaptic GABA receptors, located on GnRH neurons, are not activated, and as a consequence, GnRH is not released. Interestingly enough, the inhibitory effect of AEA was higher than that of 2-AG [, ]. Olah and coworkers postulated that the difference between the effects of AEA and 2-AG on the serum levels of LH is due to the difference in receptor activation as AEA can activate both CB1 and TRPV1 receptors while 2-AG acts only on the CB1 receptor []. Furthermore, CB1 receptor expression varies between males and females, thereby indicating that males are more sensitive to cannabinoid-induced changes and subsequently the secretion of pituitary hormones [].
CB1 receptors have also been found to be present in the Leydig cells of mice and rats. LH and testosterone secretion were decreased in CB1 receptor-inactivated mice. However, in wild-type mice, AEA suppressed the levels of both of these hormones []. When they are activated through the endogenous cannabinoid AEA, it not only results in a drop in testosterone levels, but this alteration in sex steroid level can also disturb the spermatogenic process [, , ]. It was furthermore showed that these CB1 receptors are responsible for the actions of exogenous cannabinoids [].
Sertoli cells play an important role during germ cell development as they nurture the developing spermatozoa. Sertoli cells not only have CB1 and CB2 receptors but also have TRPV1 receptors. AEA can act via these receptors to induce apoptosis of these cells [] (see Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
The involvement of cannabinoids, vanilloid receptors, and FSH in Sertoli cell function. (AA arachidonic acid, EtNH 2 ethylamine, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone)
FSH acts on its receptor on the Sertoli cell to activate two separate pathways. It activates adenylate cyclase which, in turn, causes PKA activation via cAMP, thereby causing increased expression of FAAH []. The other pathway triggered by FSH is by the activation of PI-3 which stimulates the expression of aromatases (at a transcriptional level) and thus increase estrogen levels in the cell (see Fig. 1). This subsequently causes an increase in FAAH expression by activation of the FAAH promoter through the estrogen response element. FAAH helps to hydrolyze AEA and thereby decrease the intracellular level of AEA. Thus, FAAH has a protective role in preventing AEA-induced apoptosis []. Interestingly, studies showed that the CB2 receptor can also play a protective role by decreasing programmed cell death []. Activation of CB2 receptors protects Sertoli cells against AEA-induced/mediated apoptosis [, ].

ECS and sperm function

Both CB1 and CB2 receptors are present on spermatozoa. CB1 has been localized to the plasma membrane of the acrosomal region, midpiece, and tail of the spermatozoon, while CB2 receptors are mostly localized in the postacrosomal region as well as midpiece and tail [, , ]. The transporters as well as enzymes responsible for synthesis and hydrolysis of endocannabinoids have also been identified in the male gametes of various species, including humans. Francavilla et al. therefore concluded therefore that human spermatozoa exhibit a completely functional ECS []. As AEA is present in human seminal plasma [, ], spermatozoa are therefore also exposed to this compound in the epididymis [], and it is inevitable that the ECS thus play a potential modulatory role in sperm function [] (see Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
The influence of the endocannabinoid system on sperm function. (AA arachidonic acid, AEA N-arachidonoylethanolamine or anandamide, CB1R cannabinoid receptor 1, CB2R cannabinoid receptor 2, EMT endocannabinoid membrane transporter, EtNH 2 ethylamine, ...
AEA, as mentioned earlier, is a primary endocannabinoid. As shown in Fig. 2, it is synthesized from the membrane phospholipid N-archidonyl-phosphatidyl ethanolamine (NAPE) by the enzyme NAPE-PLD [] inside the spermatozoa from where it is transported to the outside via the EMT. [] AEA can also move back into the cell via the EMT. Once outside, it can act on both CB1 and CB2 receptors []. Activation of these receptors modulates the motility of spermatozoa. CB1 receptor activation was found to not only decrease motility and viability of spermatozoa [] but also inhibit the capacitation-induced acrosomal reaction []. Similarly, the CB1 antagonist, rimonabant (SR141716), increased sperm motility and viability, while it also induced capacitation and the acrosome reaction. It had an overall lipolytic action on the spermatozoa, and it also induced energy expenditure possibly through induction of the pAkt and pBc12 proteins that control pro-survival pathways and regulate metabolism []. Studies also showed that CB2 modulated the motility of spermatozoa. It was shown that CB2 activation caused an increase in the slow/sluggish progressive sperm population and CB1 activation increased the immobile spermatozoa []. In humans, the endogenous agonists activate both CB1 and CB2 receptors. Therefore, motility will depend on the dose of the agonist. This is particularly important as the exogenous cannabinoids might cause an inappropriate decrease in motility of spermatozoa. If these substances cause poor motility, it will result in inappropriate completion of capacitation in an area of the female reproductive tract prior to meeting the oocyte []. Spermatozoa also express the vanilloid TRPV1 receptor. Along with CB1 receptors, the TRPV1 receptor has been found to play a role in spermatozoa capacitation []. The activation of the TRPV1 receptor through AEA binding helps to prevent the spontaneous acrosome reaction to occur in an untimely manner before reaching the oocyte. Unlike the CB1 and CB2 receptors, binding to the TRPV1 receptor occurs intracellularly [, ].
Supporting the physiological observations mentioned previously, a study of 86 men presenting at an infertility clinic showed that the levels of AEA in the seminal plasma of both asthenozoospermic and oligoasthenozoospermic men were significantly lower compared to normozoospermic men []. Similarly, the levels of CB1 mRNA were also decreased significantly in the spermatozoa from these men [].
The endocannabinoid AEA was found to decrease the mitochondrial activity of spermatozoa, likely through CB1-mediated inhibition, which, in turn, will hamper sperm viability and functions such as motility in a dose-dependent manner [, ]. AEA also affected motility, capacitation, and acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa in a similar dose-dependent manner [, ]. These findings suggest a possible role for the cannabinoid system in the pathogenesis of some forms of male infertility.
Mice spermatozoa are exposed to decreasing concentrations of 2-AG, from caput to cauda, during epididymal transit. This gradient is probably necessary to counteract CB1-dependant inhibition of motility and to keep spermatozoa quiescent until release []. Ricci et al. [] also concluded that CB1 receptors play a central role in preventing the acquisition of motility at too early a stage in the epididymis.
Endocannabinoids inhibit the biochemical and physiological changes needed for sperm to undergo capacitation through a CB1-mediated mechanism [–] and subsequently reduces the ability to AR in various species []. In addition, capacitated spermatozoa show a general downregulation of the expression of ECS elements compared to non-capacitated sperm [, ].
The distinct compartmentalization of CB1/CB2 receptors and of TRPV1 in spermatozoa as well as their levels of expression may critically regulate sperm function. Additionally, the presence of an endocannabinoid gradient in both the male and female reproductive tract can lead to differential spatiotemporal activation of these receptors, thereby affecting sperm function and the various fertilization steps [, ].

Marijuana, phytocannabinoids, and male reproduction

It is to be expected that exogenous cannabinoids, such as those present in marijuana, compete with endocannabinoids for binding on the cannabinoid receptors. This can disturb the ECS, and the resultant imbalance can impact fertility []. It is not surprising then that studies consistently conclude that marijuana negatively affects male fertility.

Effect on the HPG axis

As previously mentioned, cannabinoid receptors are closely related to neurons in the hypothalamus and GnRH release has been shown to be inhibited in males by AEA and THC through interaction with GABA and other systems [, –]. This reduction in gonadoliberins can cascade to the rest of the HPG axis as to be discussed subsequently (see Table ​Table1).1). Similarly to the effects on the HPG axis, the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis activity has also been showed to be affected by marijuana use in adolescents [].
Table 1
Effect of marijuana use on reproductive hormones in males

FSH

Many studies showed that FSH levels were not significantly affected by THC as it presumably acts through LHRH [, , ]. Thus far, only a single study has reported that chronic marijuana use decreased FSH levels, but this was exclusively found in high consumption users []. However, FSH has an important influence on the ECS as it increases FAAH (enzyme which degrades AEA) expression through different pathways in Sertoli cells. Thereby, FSH regulates AEA-mediated apoptosis in Sertoli cells [].

LH

Similar to the effects of marijuana on FSH levels, inconclusive findings are also reported in the literature with regards to its effects on LH. In general, it is believed that marijuana consumption decreases LH levels [–]. These findings are supported by a study conducted by Wenger and colleagues who injected THC into the third cerebral ventricle of male rats. It showed that THC indirectly decreased the level of LH by inhibiting the release of LHRH from the hypothalamus []. These results are similar to those observed in Rhesus monkeys []. In a later study, the Wenger group showed that CB1 receptors are actually present in the anterior pituitary and cannabinoids can therefore exert their action at both pituitary and hypothalamic levels []. In short, LH levels can be decreased by THC mediated through CB1 receptors.

Testosterone

There have been contradictory results as far as the effect of marijuana on testosterone levels is concerned. In a case control study conducted on males (18 to 26 years) who used marijuana for a minimum of 4 days a week for at least a period of 6 months without the use of other drugs, it was reported that there was a statistically significant drop in testosterone levels. The findings were similar after chronic and acute exposure []. However, another study conducted on 66 males showed that neither chronic nor acute intake of marijuana had a significant effect on plasma testosterone levels []. The main difference between the two studies is the fact that the latter study also included subjects who drank cannabis as a tea. Some other studies also showed that testosterone levels did not vary much after marijuana use [, ]. These observations are interesting in spite of the fact that CB1 receptor activation by AEA caused a drop in testosterone levels [] and that animal models (rats and monkeys) showed a marked reduction in testosterone in response to THC and CBD treatment [, ].

Estrogen

To investigate the possible estrogenic effects of marijuana smoke condensate (MSC) and cannabinoids, a study was conducted on human breast cancer cells. It was reported that THC, CBD, and CBN had no effect, but MSC stimulated cell proliferation []. Some studies propose that marijuana use can even lead to gynecomastia. Moreover, the estrogenic effects of MSC were also observed during the immature rat uterotrophic assay as evidenced by an increase in uterus to body weight ratio []. As THC, CBD, and CBN did not have any estrogenic actions on their own, either the combined effects of these must be responsible for the changes observed or perhaps the phenolic compounds contained in MSC may play a role.

Effect on reproductive organs

Not many reports are available on the direct and physical effects of marijuana use on the reproductive organs of men. Kolodny et al. [] reported no change in testicular size and texture in chronic marijuana users. However, a number of animal studies have reported direct effects on various reproductive organs. Prolonged cannabis exposure reduced the ventral prostate, seminal vesicle, and epididymal weights in both rats and mice [–]. These findings were accompanied by histological evidence showing disruption of the basement membrane, significant shrinkage of the seminiferous tubules marked by appearance of giant cells in their lumen, reduction in the number of spermatogonia, and furthermore spermatogenic cells showing degeneration, vacuolated/scanty cytoplasm, and small dense nuclei. It was also reported that testicular degeneration and necrosis was induced in dogs after only 30 days of cannabis administration []. Results from various experiments of a very eloquent study not only showed a significant decrease in weight and increase in apoptosis of mice testes (in vivo) after cannabis treatment, but it also reports on significantly decreased testicular LH receptor (LHR) and FAAH expression, thus suggesting that cannabis has a direct action on testicular activity []. Hypogonadism was also reported by Harclerode et al. []. A number of other animal studies correspondingly reported that THC reduces the activities of the enzymes, beta-glucuronidase, alpha-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, and fructose-6-phosphatase in a dose-related manner in the testis, prostate as well as in the epididymis []. From these findings, it can be concluded that THC interfere with the normal physiology and functioning of the male reproductive organs.
Interestingly, in a recent population-based case–control study, a specific association was observed between marijuana use and the risk of testicular tumors (non-seminoma and mixed histology). The authors went on to caution that recreational and therapeutic use of cannabinoids by young men may confer malignant potential to testicular germ cells [].

Effect on sperm parameters and function

As the ECS is so deeply involved in the regulation of the male reproductive system, a number of studies have investigated the effect of cannabis on various sperm parameters. Just as the blood–brain barrier protects the brain, the blood–testis barrier provides protection to the testis against harmful substances. However, cannabinoids are lipophilic, and they accumulate in membranes and testicular/epidydimal fat from where it can be released slowly, and this exposure can affect spermatozoa and their function [] (see Table ​Table22).
Table 2
Effect of marijuana and cannabinoids on human sperm parameters and function
A decrease in sperm concentration has been reported in both humans [, , ] and animals [] after regular exposure to cannabis. It also appears that sperm counts are inversely proportional to the amount of drug taken []. There is limited evidence for marijuana use to be associated with morphological abnormalities in human spermatozoa []. However, in a recently performed unmatched case-referent study with 1700 participants, it was clearly reported that cannabis exposure is a risk factor for poor sperm morphology (OR ¼ 1.94, 95 % CI 1.05–3.60) []. Morphological abnormalities due to cannabis have been well documented in animal studies. Interestingly, it appears as if THC and CBN, but not CBD, leads to more morphological abnormalities [].
Human seminal plasma, mid-cycle fallopian tubal fluid as well as follicular fluid contains AEA which suggests that human spermatozoa are sequentially exposed to AEA, indicating a potential modulatory role for the ECS on sperm function [, , ]. Even more profound is the fact that small amounts of THC have been shown to be secreted by the vagina into the vaginal fluid in women who regularly use marijuana, leading to stimulation of spermatozoa and possibly affecting sperm function [, ].
From the literature, it is evident that sperm motility and viability is mediated via endocannabinoids and CB receptors. Met AEA (stable form of AEA) was shown to decrease human sperm motility and viability via its action through CB1 []. Several other in vitro studies on human spermatozoa are in agreement with these findings [, , , ]. Whan et al. [] exposed human spermatozoa to both therapeutic and recreational levels of THC and showed clearly that it reduced the percentage of motile and progressively motile spermatozoa, while the kinematic parameters such as straight line velocity and average path velocity were also decreased. These observations are supported by both in vitro [] and in vivo animal studies [] where it is clearly shown that THC attenuates sperm motility and viability. The fact that THC impairs sperm motility and viability can be explained partially by the fact that it inhibits mitochondrial respiration and activity; therefore, the exposed spermatozoa are starved from energy []. These findings are supported by the marked reduction in sperm ATP levels due to THC []. It was also shown that THC inhibits fructose metabolism. With fructose being a major energy source for spermatozoa, this could further hamper sperm motility []. Glycolysis combined with oxidative phosphorylation also provides fuel for many other energy-dependent processes including capacitation and the acrosome reaction []. Disturbing the ECS homeostasis will subsequently adversely affect these energy-dependent processes with implications for gaining fertilizing potential.
The ECS is important in keeping the spermatozoa from undergoing capacitation before reaching of the oocyte []. This is essential in preventing the spermatozoa from undergoing untimely capacitation in an unusual location. The fact that the process of capacitation is inhibited by cannabinoids means that this effect can be extrapolated to marijuana. It was shown that Met AEA, which is the stable analogue of AEA, inhibits capacitation via the activation of CB1 receptor [].
Cannabinoids (AEA, THC) has an effect on the acrosome reaction too. CB1 receptor activation prevents the acrosome reaction from occurring [, , ]. Similar inhibitory findings were observed for both the spontaneous and induced AR after in vitro treatment of spermatozoa with either therapeutic or recreational concentrations of THC [].
Fertilizing ability of spermatozoa also appears to be affected as hyperactivated motility, necessary for penetration of zona pellucida, as well as hemizona binding were negatively affected in AEA-treated spermatozoa. Interestingly, low/physiological concentrations of AEA stimulated hyperactivated motility while it was attenuated at higher dosages. This biphasic effect was shown between 1 to 6 h of incubation in AEA [].
Spermatozoa can also be cytogenetically affected by marijuana as Zimmermann et al. demonstrated that as little as five consecutive days of treatment with THC, CBN, or CBD, respectively, caused increased ring and chain translocations but showed no difference in chromosome breaks, deletions, and aneuploidy in mice spermatozoa [].

Effect on libido and sexual function

In both males and females, arousability and sexual behavior appear to be modulated by ECBs. It is well established that a group of oxytocinergic neurons containing CB1 receptors in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) regulate erectile function and copulatory behavior of males []. The use and effect of cannabis on sexual function are extremely controversial and more than likely subject-specific. Anecdotal aphrodisiac-like properties of cannabis as described by some users are likely the result of altered perceptual processing of the sexual encounter.
Currently limited evidence from human clinical trials is available to suggest any beneficial and/or detrimental effects of cannabis on male libido and sexual function []. In one study, acute use of marijuana has been shown to increase sexual drive, but chronic use of marijuana was reported to decrease libido in males []. These sentiments were echoed by Abel who stated that a lesser amount of cannabis can enhance sexual activity, but larger quantities may impede sexual motivation []. Besides, similar dose effects were reported by American Indian men who were chronic cannabis users [].
A study conducted in mice exposed to chronic administration of THC for 30 days showed that there was significant loss of libido in these rodents []. It was also shown in a rat model that marijuana use was associated with impotence []. Results from studies on non-human primates suggest that cannabinoids have a predominant detrimental effect on male sexual motivation and erectile function []. Various other studies however report that cannabis intensified arousal and enhanced sexual pleasure in men [, ]. Di Marzo and coworkers reported that THC weakens sexual drive by interfering with the production of testosterone [].
In a large Swiss study (n > 9000), cannabis was indirectly associated to both premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction (ED) []. Similarly, it was also showed in another recent study that chronic cannabis consumption can cause vascular ED in young habitual cannabis users through its effect on endothelial function []. However, no link between frequency of cannabis use and trouble keeping an erection was reported in a study where 4350 men were screened for the use of cannabis and its sexual effects [].
Despite marijuana use being implicated to cause reduced libido, gynecomastia, and erectile disorders [], no properly controlled study has been performed in humans to substantiate these speculations.

Conclusion

It is beyond doubt that recreational and medicinal marijuana usage will increase and become even more prevalent. Given the deep involvement of the ECS in the regulation of male reproduction and the direct impact of exogenous cannabinoids on the homeostasis of the ECS, the potential thread represented by marijuana on the finely tuned events associated with male fertilizing ability must definitely be considered [, ]. Surprisingly, very few studies have explored the direct effect of marijuana on male fertility. This can mainly be ascribed to legislation and ethical considerations making it virtually impossible to pursue in vivo human studies. The current body of knowledge pertaining to this topic mainly consists of a number of earlier human studies and more recently animal, in vitro, and retrospective studies. Despite these limitations, it is clear that marijuana and its compounds can influence male fertility at multiple levels. A number of studies have attributed dysregulation of the HPG axis, and in specific reduction in a key hormone such as LH, which, in turn, can affect testosterone and spermatogenesis to marijuana. It appears as if marijuana can actually affect semen parameters and sperm function by acting through both the cannabinoid and vanilloid receptors. Furthermore, sexual health has also been linked to marijuana as it seems to have an effect on erectile function.
With the change in legislation and decriminalization of marijuana use, as well as the fact that some studies report conflicting and contradictory findings, it is paramount that more clinical studies should be undertaken to examine the effects of marijuana use in greater detail. Despite that human studies are currently few and limited by their observational nature, the existing proof substantiates the claim that marijuana use has a detrimental effect on male reproductive potential []. Of interest would also be to explore the confounding effects of marijuana use on tobacco smokers as a recent study revealed that cigarette smokers are greater abusers of cannabis, whilst cigarette smoking males of infertile couples showed lower ejaculate volumes despite higher testosterone levels []. All the above findings underline the fact that clinicians should include questions on marijuana usage while evaluating infertility in males. Health professionals should definitely also keep the association and potential impact of marijuana on male fertility in mind when prescribing medical marijuana.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by financial assistance from the American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, USA, the Harry Crossley Foundation, and the NRF, South Africa.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no relevant financial and competing interests.

Author contributions

S.S.D.P. conceived the idea, researched data, and wrote the article. All authors made substantial contributions to the discussion of content and reviewed/edited the manuscript before submission.

Footnotes

Capsule We highlight the latest evidence regarding the effect of marijuana use on male fertility and provide a detailed insight into its significance in the male reproductive system. Marijuana and its compounds can influence male fertility at multiple levels by acting through both the cannabinoid and vanilloid receptors.

Contributor Information

Stefan S. du Plessis, az.ca.nus@pdss.
Ashok Agarwal, Phone: (216) 444-9485, gro.fcc@aawraga.
Arun Syriac, moc.liamg@cairysrd.

References

1. Bifulco M, Pisanti S. Medicinal use of cannabis in Europe: the fact that more countries legalize the medicinal use of cannabis should not become an argument for unfettered and uncontrolled use. EMBO Rep. 2015;16(2):130–132. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439742. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Zimmerman AM, Zimmerman S, Raj AY. Effects of cannabinoids on spermatogenesis in mice. Adv Biosci. 1978;22–23:407–418. [PubMed]
3. Schuel H, Schuel R, Zimmerman AM, Zimmerman S. Cannabinoids reduce fertility of sea urchin sperm. Biochem Cell Biol. 1987;65(2):130–136. doi: 10.1139/o87-018. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Bari M, Battista N, Pirazzi V, Maccarrone M. The manifold actions of endocannabinoids on female and male reproductive events. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2011;16:498–516. doi: 10.2741/3701. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Fronczak CM, Kim ED, Barqawi AB. The insults of illicit drug use on male fertility. J Androl. 2012;33(4):515–528. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.110.011874. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. WHO. Management of substance abuse: facts and figures. WHO. 2015. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/facts/cannabis/en/. Accessed 11 Feb 2015 2015
7. SAMHSA. National survey on drug use and health: summary of national findings. Department of Health and Human Services. 2013. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUHresultsPDFWHTML2013/Web/NSDUHresults2013.htm#ch2. Accessed 18 Feb 2015
8. Fasano S, Meccariello R, Cobellis G, Chianese R, Cacciola G, Chioccarelli T, et al. The endocannabinoid system: an ancient signaling involved in the control of male fertility. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1163:112–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04437.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Rossato M, Pagano C, Vettor R. The cannabinoid system and male reproductive functions. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20(Suppl 1):90–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01680.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Shamloul R, Bella AJ. Impact of cannabis use on male sexual health. J Sex Med. 2011;8(4):971–975. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02198.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Fusar-Poli P, Crippa JA, Bhattacharyya S, Borgwardt SJ, Allen P, Martin-Santos R, et al. Distinct effects of {delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on neural activation during emotional processing. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(1):95–105. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.519. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Grotenhermen F. Some practice-relevant aspects of the pharmacokinetics of THC. Forsch Komplementarmed. 1999;6 Suppl 3:37–9. doi:57155. [PubMed]
13. Thakur GA, Duclos RI, Jr, Makriyannis A. Natural cannabinoids: templates for drug discovery. Life Sci. 2005;78(5):454–466. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.09.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Baker D, Pryce G, Giovannoni G, Thompson AJ. The therapeutic potential of cannabis. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(5):291–298. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00381-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Sugiura T, Waku K. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol and the cannabinoid receptors. Chem Phys Lipids. 2000;108(1–2):89–106. doi: 10.1016/S0009-3084(00)00189-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G, et al. Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science. 1992;258(5090):1946–1949. doi: 10.1126/science.1470919. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Habayeb OM, Bell SC, Konje JC. Endogenous cannabinoids: metabolism and their role in reproduction. Life Sci. 2002;70(17):1963–1977. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01539-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Meccariello R, Battista N. Updates in reproduction coming from the endocannabinoid system. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:412354. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Cacciola G, Chioccarelli T, Ricci G, Meccariello R, Fasano S, Pierantoni R, et al. The endocannabinoid system in vertebrate male reproduction: a comparative overview. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;286(1–2 Suppl 1):S24–S30. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.01.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Battista N, Rapino C, Di Tommaso M, Bari M, Pasquariello N, Maccarrone M. Regulation of male fertility by the endocannabinoid system. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;286(1–2 Suppl 1):S17–S23. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.01.010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Katona I, Freund TF. Endocannabinoid signaling as a synaptic circuit breaker in neurological disease. Nat Med. 2008;14(9):923–930. doi: 10.1038/nm.f.1869. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Ahn K, McKinney MK, Cravatt BF. Enzymatic pathways that regulate endocannabinoid signaling in the nervous system. Chem Rev. 2008;108(5):1687–1707. doi: 10.1021/cr0782067. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Beltramo M, Piomelli D. Carrier-mediated transport and enzymatic hydrolysis of the endogenous cannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol. Neuroreport. 2000;11(6):1231–1235. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200004270-00018. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Di Marzo V, De Petrocellis L. Why do cannabinoid receptors have more than one endogenous ligand? Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2012;367(1607):3216–3228. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0382. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Ligresti A, Cascio MG, Di Marzo V. Endocannabinoid metabolic pathways and enzymes. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord. 2005;4(6):615–623. doi: 10.2174/156800705774933104. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Starowicz K, Nigam S, Di Marzo V. Biochemistry and pharmacology of endovanilloids. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;114(1):13–33. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.01.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Lewis SE, Maccarrone M. Endocannabinoids, sperm biology and human fertility. Pharmacol Res. 2009;60(2):126–131. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.02.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. McKinney MK, Cravatt BF. Structure and function of fatty acid amide hydrolase. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:411–432. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133450. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Di Marzo V. Biosynthesis and inactivation of endocannabinoids: relevance to their proposed role as neuromodulators. Life Sci. 1999;65(6–7):645–655. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(99)00287-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Di Marzo V, De Petrocellis L. Endocannabinoids as regulators of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels: a further opportunity to develop new endocannabinoid-based therapeutic drugs. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17(14):1430–1449. doi: 10.2174/092986710790980078. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Howlett AC, Barth F, Bonner TI, Cabral G, Casellas P, Devane WA, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2002;54(2):161–202. doi: 10.1124/pr.54.2.161. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Munro S, Thomas KL, Abu-Shaar M. Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature. 1993;365(6441):61–65. doi: 10.1038/365061a0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Howlett AC, Qualy JM, Khachatrian LL. Involvement of Gi in the inhibition of adenylate cyclase by cannabimimetic drugs. Mol Pharmacol. 1986;29(3):307–313. [PubMed]
34. Howlett AC. Pharmacology of cannabinoid receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995;35:607–634. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.003135. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Caulfield MP, Brown DA. Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit Ca current in NG108-15 neuroblastoma cells via a pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanism. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;106(2):231–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb14321.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Matsuda LA, Lolait SJ, Brownstein MJ, Young AC, Bonner TI. Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature. 1990;346(6284):561–564. doi: 10.1038/346561a0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Pertwee RG, Howlett AC, Abood ME, Alexander SP, Di Marzo V, Elphick MR, et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIX. Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands: beyond CB(1) and CB(2) Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62(4):588–631. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.003004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Glass M, Dragunow M, Faull RL. Cannabinoid receptors in the human brain: a detailed anatomical and quantitative autoradiographic study in the fetal, neonatal and adult human brain. Neuroscience. 1997;77(2):299–318. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00428-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Herkenham M, Lynn AB, Little MD, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, de Costa BR, et al. Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(5):1932–1936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1932. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. El-Talatini MR, Taylor AH, Elson JC, Brown L, Davidson AC, Konje JC. Localisation and function of the endocannabinoid system in the human ovary. PLoS One. 2009;4(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004579. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Tambaro S, Mongeau R, Dessi C, Pani L, Ruiu S. Modulation of ATP-mediated contractions of the rat vas deferens through presynaptic cannabinoid receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;525(1–3):150–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.09.058. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Walczak JS, Price TJ, Cervero F. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are expressed in the mouse urinary bladder and their activation modulates afferent bladder activity. Neuroscience. 2009;159(3):1154–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.01.050. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Matsuda LA, Bonner TI, Lolait SJ. Localization of cannabinoid receptor mRNA in rat brain. J Comp Neurol. 1993;327(4):535–550. doi: 10.1002/cne.903270406. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Pertwee RG, Ross RA, Craib SJ, Thomas A. (−)-Cannabidiol antagonizes cannabinoid receptor agonists and noradrenaline in the mouse vas deferens. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;456(1–3):99–106. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02624-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Gye MC, Kang HH, Kang HJ. Expression of cannabinoid receptor 1 in mouse testes. Arch Androl. 2005;51(3):247–255. doi: 10.1080/014850190898845. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Agirregoitia E, Carracedo A, Subiran N, Valdivia A, Agirregoitia N, Peralta L, et al. The CB(2) cannabinoid receptor regulates human sperm cell motility. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(5):1378–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.153. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Rossato M, Ion Popa F, Ferigo M, Clari G, Foresta C. Human sperm express cannabinoid receptor Cb1, the activation of which inhibits motility, acrosome reaction, and mitochondrial function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(2):984–991. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1287. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Viscomi MT, Oddi S, Latini L, Pasquariello N, Florenzano F, Bernardi G, et al. Selective CB2 receptor agonism protects central neurons from remote axotomy-induced apoptosis through the PI3K/Akt pathway. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2009;29(14):4564–4570. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0786-09.2009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Maccarrone M, Cecconi S, Rossi G, Battista N, Pauselli R, Finazzi-Agro A. Anandamide activity and degradation are regulated by early postnatal aging and follicle-stimulating hormone in mouse Sertoli cells. Endocrinology. 2003;144(1):20–28. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220544. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Lauckner JE, Jensen JB, Chen HY, Lu HC, Hille B, Mackie K. GPR55 is a cannabinoid receptor that increases intracellular calcium and inhibits M current. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(7):2699–2704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711278105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Moriconi A, Cerbara I, Maccarrone M, Topai A. GPR55: current knowledge and future perspectives of a purported “type-3” cannabinoid receptor. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17(14):1411–1429. doi: 10.2174/092986710790980069. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Francavilla F, Battista N, Barbonetti A, Vassallo MR, Rapino C, Antonangelo C, et al. Characterization of the endocannabinoid system in human spermatozoa and involvement of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptor in their fertilizing ability. Endocrinology. 2009;150(10):4692–4700. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0057. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Toth A, Blumberg PM, Boczan J. Anandamide and the vanilloid receptor (TRPV1) Vitam Horm. 2009;81:389–419. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(09)81015-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Pistis M, Melis M. From surface to nuclear receptors: the endocannabinoid family extends its assets. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17(14):1450–1467. doi: 10.2174/092986710790980014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Shalet SM. Normal testicular function and spermatogenesis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53(2):285–288. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22000. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Wenger T, Ledent C, Csernus V, Gerendai I. The central cannabinoid receptor inactivation suppresses endocrine reproductive functions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;284(2):363–368. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4977. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Scorticati C, Fernandez-Solari J, De Laurentiis A, Mohn C, Prestifilippo JP, Lasaga M, et al. The inhibitory effect of anandamide on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone secretion is reversed by estrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(32):11891–11896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404366101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Farkas I, Kallo I, Deli L, Vida B, Hrabovszky E, Fekete C, et al. Retrograde endocannabinoid signaling reduces GABAergic synaptic transmission to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Endocrinology. 2010;151(12):5818–5829. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0638. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Fernandez-Solari J, Scorticati C, Mohn C, De Laurentiis A, Billi S, Franchi A, et al. Alcohol inhibits luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release by activating the endocannabinoid system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(9):3264–3268. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307346101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Olah M, Milloh H, Wenger T. The role of endocannabinoids in the regulation of luteinizing hormone and prolactin release. Differences between the effects of AEA and 2AG. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;286(1–2 Suppl 1):S36–S40. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.01.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Gonzalez S, Manzanares J, Berrendero F, Wenger T, Corchero J, Bisogno T, et al. Identification of endocannabinoids and cannabinoid CB(1) receptor mRNA in the pituitary gland. Neuroendocrinology. 1999;70(2):137–45. doi:54468. [PubMed]
62. Rossi G, Gasperi V, Paro R, Barsacchi D, Cecconi S, Maccarrone M. Follicle-stimulating hormone activates fatty acid amide hydrolase by protein kinase A and aromatase-dependent pathways in mouse primary Sertoli cells. Endocrinology. 2007;148(3):1431–1439. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0969. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
63. McDonald CA, Millena AC, Reddy S, Finlay S, Vizcarra J, Khan SA, et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone-induced aromatase in immature rat Sertoli cells requires an active phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and is inhibited via the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(3):608–618. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0245. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
64. Aquila S, Guido C, Santoro A, Perrotta I, Laezza C, Bifulco M, et al. Human sperm anatomy: ultrastructural localization of the cannabinoid1 receptor and a potential role of anandamide in sperm survival and acrosome reaction. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2010;293(2):298–309. doi: 10.1002/ar.21042. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
65. Schuel H, Burkman LJ, Lippes J, Crickard K, Forester E, Piomelli D, et al. N-Acylethanolamines in human reproductive fluids. Chem Phys Lipids. 2002;121(1–2):211–227. doi: 10.1016/S0009-3084(02)00158-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
66. Amoako AA, Marczylo TH, Lam PM, Willets JM, Derry A, Elson J, et al. Quantitative analysis of anandamide and related acylethanolamides in human seminal plasma by ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010;878(31):3231–3237. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.09.024. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
67. Schuel H, Burkman LJ, Lippes J, Crickard K, Mahony MC, Giuffrida A, et al. Evidence that anandamide-signaling regulates human sperm functions required for fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;63(3):376–387. doi: 10.1002/mrd.90021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
68. Okamoto Y, Morishita J, Tsuboi K, Tonai T, Ueda N. Molecular characterization of a phospholipase D generating anandamide and its congeners. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(7):5298–5305. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306642200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
69. Amoako AA, Marczylo TH, Marczylo EL, Elson J, Willets JM, Taylor AH, et al. Anandamide modulates human sperm motility: implications for men with asthenozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2058–2066. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det232. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
70. Aquila S, Guido C, Santoro A, Gazzerro P, Laezza C, Baffa MF, et al. Rimonabant (SR141716) induces metabolism and acquisition of fertilizing ability in human sperm. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;159(4):831–841. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00570.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
71. Gervasi MG, Osycka-Salut C, Caballero J, Vazquez-Levin M, Pereyra E, Billi S, et al. Anandamide capacitates bull spermatozoa through CB1 and TRPV1 activation. PLoS One. 2011;6(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016993. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
72. Bernabo N, Palestini P, Chiarini M, Maccarrone M, Mattioli M, Barboni B. Endocannabinoid-binding CB1 and TRPV1 receptors as modulators of sperm capacitation. Commun Integr Biol. 2012;5(1):68–70. doi: 10.4161/cib.18118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
73. Cobellis G, Cacciola G, Scarpa D, Meccariello R, Chianese R, Franzoni MF, et al. Endocannabinoid system in frog and rodent testis: type-1 cannabinoid receptor and fatty acid amide hydrolase activity in male germ cells. Biol Reprod. 2006;75(1):82–89. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.051730. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
74. Ricci G, Cacciola G, Altucci L, Meccariello R, Pierantoni R, Fasano S, et al. Endocannabinoid control of sperm motility: the role of epididymus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2007;153(1–3):320–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.02.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
75. Maccarrone M, Barboni B, Paradisi A, Bernabo N, Gasperi V, Pistilli MG, et al. Characterization of the endocannabinoid system in boar spermatozoa and implications for sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(Pt 19):4393–4404. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02536. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
76. Rossato M. Endocannabinoids, sperm functions and energy metabolism. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;286(1–2 Suppl 1):S31–S35. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.02.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
77. Aquila S, Guido C, Laezza C, Santoro A, Pezzi V, Panza S, et al. A new role of anandamide in human sperm: focus on metabolism. J Cell Physiol. 2009;221(1):147–153. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21837. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
78. Pierantoni R, Cobellis G, Meccariello R, Cacciola G, Chianese R, Chioccarelli T, et al. CB1 activity in male reproduction: mammalian and nonmammalian animal models. Vitam Horm. 2009;81:367–387. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(09)81014-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
79. Rapino C, Battista N, Bari M, Maccarrone M. Endocannabinoids as biomarkers of human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):501–516. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
80. Murphy LL, Munoz RM, Adrian BA, Villanua MA. Function of cannabinoid receptors in the neuroendocrine regulation of hormone secretion. Neurobiol Dis. 1998;5(6 Pt B):432–446. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1998.0224. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
81. Pagotto U, Marsicano G, Cota D, Lutz B, Pasquali R. The emerging role of the endocannabinoid system in endocrine regulation and energy balance. Endocr Rev. 2006;27(1):73–100. doi: 10.1210/er.2005-0009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
82. Wang H, Dey SK, Maccarrone M. Jekyll and hyde: two faces of cannabinoid signaling in male and female fertility. Endocr Rev. 2006;27(5):427–448. doi: 10.1210/er.2006-0006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
83. Cone EJ, Johnson RE, Moore JD, Roache JD. Acute effects of smoking marijuana on hormones, subjective effects and performance in male human subjects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986;24(6):1749–1754. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90515-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
84. Vescovi PP, Pedrazzoni M, Michelini M, Maninetti L, Bernardelli F, Passeri M. Chronic effects of marihuana smoking on luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and prolactin levels in human males. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1992;30(1):59–63. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(92)90036-C. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
85. Kolodny RC, Masters WH, Kolodner RM, Toro G. Depression of plasma testosterone levels after chronic intensive marihuana use. N Engl J Med. 1974;290(16):872–874. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197404182901602. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
86. Mendelson JH, Kuehnle J, Ellingboe J, Babor TF. Plasma testosterone levels before, during and after chronic marihuana smoking. N Engl J Med. 1974;291(20):1051–1055. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197411142912003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
87. Hembree WC, Zeidenberg P, Nahas GG. Marihuana’s effects on human gonadal function. In: Nahas GG, editor. Marihuana, chemistry, biochemistry and cellular effects. New York: Springer; 1976. pp. 521–532.
88. Huizink AC, Ferdinand RF, Ormel J, Verhulst FC. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity and early onset of cannabis use. Addiction. 2006;101(11):1581–1588. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01570.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
89. Wenger T, Rettori V, Snyder GD, Dalterio S, McCann SM. Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on the hypothalamic-pituitary control of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in adult male rats. Neuroendocrinology. 1987;46(6):488–493. doi: 10.1159/000124870. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
90. Smith RG, Besch NF, Besch PK, Smith CG. Inhibition of gonadotropin by delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol:mediation by steroid receptors? Science. 1979;204(4390):325–327. doi: 10.1126/science.107589. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
91. Wenger T, Fernandez-Ruiz JJ, Ramos JA. Immunocytochemical demonstration of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland. J Neuroendocrinol. 1999;11(11):873–878. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.1999.00402.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
92. Friedrich G, Nepita W, Andre T. Serum testosterone concentrations in cannabis and opiate users. Beitr Gerichtl Med. 1990;48:57–66. [PubMed]
93. Smith CG, Moore CE, Besch NF, Besch PK. The effect of marihuana delta 9—tetrahydrocannabinol on the secretion of sex hormones in the mature male rhesus monkey. Clin Chem. 1976;22(7):1184.
94. List A, Nazar B, Nyquist S, Harclerode J. The effects of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on the metabolism of gonadal steroids in the rat. Drug Metab Dispos. 1977;5(3):268–272. [PubMed]
95. Lee SY, Oh SM, Chung KH. Estrogenic effects of marijuana smoke condensate and cannabinoid compounds. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006;214(3):270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.12.019. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
96. Fujimoto GI, Morrill GA, O’Connell ME, Kostellow AB, Retura G. Effects of cannabinoids given orally and reduced appetite on the male rat reproductive system. Pharmacology. 1982;24(5):303–313. doi: 10.1159/000137611. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
97. Lacson JC, Carroll JD, Tuazon E, Castelao EJ, Bernstein L, Cortessis VK. Population-based case–control study of recreational drug use and testis cancer risk confirms an association between marijuana use and nonseminoma risk. Cancer. 2012;118(21):5374–5383. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27554. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
98. Harclerode J, Nyquist SE, Nazar B, Lowe D. Effects of cannabis on sex hormones and testicular enzymes of the rodent. Adv Biosci. 1978;22–23:395–405. [PubMed]
99. Yassa HA, Dawood Ael W, Shehata MM, Abdel-Hady RH, Aal KM. Subchronic toxicity of cannabis leaves on male albino rats. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2010;29(1):37–47. doi: 10.1177/0960327109354312. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
100. Mandal TK, Das NS. Testicular toxicity in cannabis extract treated mice: association with oxidative stress and role of antioxidant enzyme systems. Toxicol Ind Health. 2010;26(1):11–23. doi: 10.1177/0748233709354553. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
101. Dixit VP, Gupta CL, Agrawal M. Testicular degeneration and necrosis induced by chronic administration of cannabis extract in dogs. Endokrinologie. 1977;69(3):299–305. [PubMed]
102. Banerjee A, Singh A, Srivastava P, Turner H, Krishna A. Effects of chronic bhang (cannabis) administration on the reproductive system of male mice. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2011;92(3):195–205. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20295. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
103. Chakravarty I, Ghosh JJ. Influence of cannabis and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on the biochemistry of the male reproductive organs. Biochem Pharmacol. 1981;30(4):273–276. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(81)90053-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
104. Nahas GG, Frick HC, Lattimer JK, Latour C, Harvey D. Pharmacokinetics of THC in brain and testis, male gametotoxicity and premature apoptosis of spermatozoa. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2002;17(2):103–113. doi: 10.1002/hup.369. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
105. Hembree WC, 3rd, Nahas GG, Zeidenberg P, Huang HF. Changes in human spermatozoa associated with high dose marihuana smoking. Adv Biosci. 1978;22–23:429–439. [PubMed]
106. Pacey AA, Povey AC, Clyma JA, McNamee R, Moore HD, Baillie H, et al. Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for poor sperm morphology. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(8):1629–1636. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu116. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
107. Barbonetti A, Vassallo MR, Fortunato D, Francavilla S, Maccarrone M, Francavilla F. Energetic metabolism and human sperm motility: impact of CB(1) receptor activation. Endocrinology. 2010;151(12):5882–5892. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0484. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
108. Whan LB, West MC, McClure N, Lewis SE. Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the primary psychoactive cannabinoid in marijuana, on human sperm function in vitro. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):653–660. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.027. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
109. Zimmerman AM, Bruce WR, Zimmerman S. Effects of cannabinoids on sperm morphology. Pharmacology. 1979;18(3):143–148. doi: 10.1159/000137243. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
110. Hall W, Degenhardt L. Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1383–1391. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61037-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
111. Morgan DJ, Muller CH, Murataeva NA, Davis BJ, Mackie K. Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC) attenuates mouse sperm motility and male fecundity. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(8):2575–2583. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01506.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
112. Badawy ZS, Chohan KR, Whyte DA, Penefsky HS, Brown OM, Souid AK. Cannabinoids inhibit the respiration of human sperm. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2471–2476. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.075. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
113. Perez LE, Smith CG, Asch RH. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits fructose utilization and motility in human, rhesus monkey, and rabbit sperm in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1981;35(6):703–705. [PubMed]
114. du Plessis SS, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, van der Linde M. Oxidative phosphorylation versus glycolysis: what fuel do spermatozoa use? Asian J Androl. 2014 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
115. Argiolas A, Melis MR. Central control of penile erection: role of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. Prog Neurobiol. 2005;76(1):1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.06.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
116. Chowdhury AR. Effect of pharmacological agents on male reproduction. Adv Contracept Deliv Syst. 1987;3(4):347–352. [PubMed]
117. Abel EL. Marihuana and sex: a critical survey. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1981;8(1):1–22. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(81)90082-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
118. Chopra GS, Jandu BS. Psychoclinical effects of long-term marijuana use in 275 Indian chronic users. A comparative assessment of effects in Indian and USA users. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;282:95–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb49889.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
119. Dhawan K, Sharma A. Restoration of chronic-delta 9-THC-induced decline in sexuality in male rats by a novel benzoflavone moiety from Passiflora incarnata Linn. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;138(1):117–120. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
120. Murphy LL, Gher J, Steger RW, Bartke A. Effects of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol on copulatory behavior and neuroendocrine responses of male rats to female conspecifics. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994;48(4):1011–1017. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)90213-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
121. Gorzalka BB, Hill MN, Chang SC. Male–female differences in the effects of cannabinoids on sexual behavior and gonadal hormone function. Horm Behav. 2010;58(1):91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.08.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
122. Tart CT. Marijuana intoxication common experiences. Nature. 1970;226(5247):701–704. doi: 10.1038/226701a0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
123. Halikas J, Weller R, Morse C. Effects of regular marijuana use on sexual performance. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1982;14(1–2):59–70. doi: 10.1080/02791072.1982.10471911. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
124. Di Marzo V, De Petrocellis L, Bisogno T. The biosynthesis, fate and pharmacological properties of endocannabinoids. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2005;168:147–185. doi: 10.1007/3-540-26573-2_5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
125. Mialon A, Berchtold A, Michaud PA, Gmel G, Suris JC. Sexual dysfunctions among young men: prevalence and associated factors. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
126. Aversa A, Rossi F, Francomano D, Bruzziches R, Bertone C, Santiemma V, et al. Early endothelial dysfunction as a marker of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction in young habitual cannabis users. Int J Impot Res. 2008;20(6):566–573. [PubMed]
127. Smith AM, Ferris JA, Simpson JM, Shelley J, Pitts MK, Richters J. Cannabis use and sexual health. J Sex Med. 2010;7(2 Pt 1):787–793. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01453.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
128. Park B, McPartland JM, Glass M. Cannabis, cannabinoids and reproduction. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2004;70(2):189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2003.04.007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
129. Alvarez S. Do some addictions interfere with fertility? Fertil Steril. 2015;103(1):22–26. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
130. Lotti AF, Corona G, Vitale P, Maseroli E, Rossi M, Fino MG, et al. Current smoking is associated with lower seminal vesicles and ejaculate volume, despite higher testosterone levels, in male subjects of infertile couples. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(3):590–602. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu347. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Posted by at