Abstract
I reflect critically on the early modern philosophical canon in light of the entrenchment and homogeneity of the lineup of seven core figures: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, and Kant. After distinguishing three elements of a philosophical canon—a causal story, a set of core philosophical questions, and a set of distinctively philosophical works—I argue that recent efforts contextualizing the history of philosophy within the history of science subtly shift the central philosophical questions and allow for a greater range of figures to be philosophically central. However, the history of science is but one context in which to situate philosophical works. Looking at the historical context of seventeenth-century philosophy of mind, one that weaves together questions of consciousness, rationality, and education, does more than shift the central questions—it brings new ones to light. It also shows that a range of genres can be properly philosophical and seamlessly diversifies the central philosophers of the period.
Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © American Philosophical Association 2016
Linked references
- HideAllThis list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.PeterAnstey . (2011) John Locke and Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MaryAstell . ([1694 and 1697] 2002) A Serious Proposal to the Ladies. Edited by PatriciaSpringborg . Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
PierreBayle . ([1696]1991) An Historical and Critical Dictionary. Edited by RichardPopkin . Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
GeorgeBerkeley . ([1710] 2009) Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Edited by H.Robinson . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OmriBoehm . (2014) ‘Freedom and the Cogito’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22, 4, 704–24.
JacquelineBroad . (2015) The Philosophy of Mary Astell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
JohnCarriero . (2009) Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes's Meditations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
MargaretCavendish . ([1666] 2001) Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. Edited by EileenO'Neill . New York: Cambridge University Press.
MargaretCavendish . (1668) Grounds of Natural Philosophy. London.
Émilie duChâtelet . (2009) Selected Philosophical and Scientific Writings. Edited by Judith P.Zinsser and translated by IsabelleBourand Judith P.Zinsser . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DesmondClarke . (2013) The Equality of the Sexes: Three Feminist Texts of the Seventheenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
NathanielColeman . (2015) ‘Interview with Aaron Salzer, “Wie die Philosophie ‘weißgewaschen’ wurde”’. Available at http://science.orf.at/stories/1759195/. English translation published at Gender Race and Philosophy: The Blog; available at http://sgrp.typepad.com/sgrp/2015/08/how-philosophy-was-whitewashed-an-interview-with-dr-nathaniel-adam-tobias-coleman-by-aaron-salzer-of-scienceorfat-t.html.
RebeccaCopenhaver . (2007) ‘Reid on Consciousness: HOP, HOT or FOR?’ The Philosophical Quarterly, 57, 613–34.
RebeccaCopenhaver . (2010) ‘Thomas Reid on Acquired Perception’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 285–310.
RebeccaCopenhaver . (2011) ‘Reid on the Moral Sense’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. Special Issue: New Essays on Reid, 41, 80–101.
RenéDescartes . (1996) Oeuvres de Descartes. 12 vols. Revised edition, edited by C.Adam and P.Tannery . Paris: J Vrin.
LisaDowning . (2014) ‘Locke's Metaphysics and Newtonian Metaphysics’. In ZviBeiner and EricSchliesser (eds.), Newton and Empiricism. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 97–118.
SaulFisher . (2005) Pierre Gassendi's Philosophy and Science: Atomism for Empiricists. Boston, MA: Brill.
DanielGarber . (1992) Descartes's Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
PierreGassendi . (1649) Syntagma philosophiae Epicuri cum refutationibus dogmatum quae contra fidem christianam ab eo assertum sunt. Lyon: Guillaume Barbier.
ÉtienneGilson . ([1913] 1960) Index scolastico-cartésien. Paris: Vrin.
Marie Le Jars deGournay . (2002) Oeuvres Complètes. Edited by J.-C.Arnould . Paris: Honoré-Champion.
DavidHume . ([1779] 2007) Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
AndrewJaniak . (2007) Newton as Philosopher. New York: Cambridge University Press.
BruceKuklick . (1984) ‘Seven Thinkers and How They Grew: Descartes, Spinoza Leibniz. Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Kant’. In R.Rorty , J. B.Schneewind , and Q.Skinner (eds.), Philosophy in History (New York: Cambridge University Press), 125–39.
JohnLocke . ([1690] 1975) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by P. H.Nidditch . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
JohnLocke . ([1693] 2000) Some Thoughts Concerning Education. Edited by JohnYolton and JeanYolton . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lucretius. ([56] 1975) De rerum natura. Edited by M. F.Smith and translated by W. H. D.Rouse . London and Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.
NicolasMalebranche . ([1688] 1997) Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion. Translated and edited by NicholasJolley and DavidScott . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bernard deMandeville . (1714) The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. London: J. Roberts.
Michel deMontaigne . (1958) The Complete Essays. Translated by DonaldFrame . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
StevenNadler . (1992) Malebranche and Ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.
AlisonPeterman . (2015) ‘Spinoza on Extension’. Philosopher's Imprint, 15, 14.
RichardPopkin . ([1979] 2004) The History of Scepticism: From Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Revised as The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. New York: Oxford University Press.
FrançoisPoullain de la Barre . (2002) Three Cartesian Feminist Treatises. Edited by M. M.Welch and translated by V.Bosley . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
FrançoisPoullain de la Barre . ([1673] 2011) De l'égalité des deux sexes, De l’éducation des dames, De l'excellence des hommes. Edited by Marie-FrédériquePellegrin . Paris: Vrin.
RichardRorty . (1984) ‘The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres’. In R.Rorty , J.Schneewind , and Q.Skinner (eds.), Philosophy and Its History (New York: Cambridge University Press), 49–76.
TadSchmaltz . (1996) Malebranche's Theory of the Soul: A Cartesian Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.
TadSchmaltz . (2002) Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LisaShapiro . (2008) ‘“Turn My Will in Completely the Opposite Direction”: Radical Doubt and Descartes's Account of Free Will’. In PaulHoffman , DavidOwen , and GideonYaffe (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press), 21–39.
LisaShapiro . (2004) ‘Some Thoughts on the Place of Women in Early Modern Philosophy’. In LilliAlanen and CharlotteWitt (eds.), Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy (Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 219–50.
LisaShapiro . (1999) ‘Cartesian Generosity’. In ‘Norms and Modes of Thinking in Descartes’. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 64, 249–75.
JamesVan Cleve . (2002) ‘Thomas Reid's Geometry of Visibles’. Philosophical Review, 111, 3, 373–416.
JamesVan Cleve . (2007) ‘Reid's Answer to Molyneux's Question’. The Monist, 90, 2, 251–70.
RichardWatson . (1987) The Breakdown of Cartesian Metaphysics. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
