Tuesday, 8 May 2018
Comparison of the oxidation of carcinogenic aristolochic acid I and II by microsomal cytochromes P450 in vitro: experimental and theoretical approaches.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653735/ Monatsh Chem. 2017;148(11):1971-1981. doi: 10.1007/s00706-017-2014-9. Epub 2017 Jul 26. Martínek V1, Bárta F1, Hodek P1, Frei E1, Schmeiser HH2, Arlt VM3,4, Stiborová M1. Author information 1 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 2030, 128 40 Prague 2, Czech Republic. 2 Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. 3 Analytical and Environmental Sciences Division, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH UK. 4 NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Health Impact of Environmental Hazards at King's College London in Partnership with Public Health England, London, SE1 9NH UK. Abstract Abstract: The herbal drug aristolochic acid, a natural mixture of 8-methoxy-6-nitrophenanthro[3,4-d]-1,3-dioxole-5-carboxylic acid (AAI) and 6-nitrophenanthro[3,4-d]-1,3-dioxole-5-carboxylic acid (AAII), is derived from Aristolochia species and is the cause of two nephropathies. Ingestion of aristolochic acid is associated with the development of urothelial tumors linked with aristolochic acid nephropathy and is implicated in the development of Balkan endemic nephropathy-associated urothelial tumors. The O-demethylated metabolite of AAI, 8-hydroxyaristolochic acid (AAIa), is the detoxification product of AAI generated by its oxidative metabolism. Whereas the formation of AAIa from AAI by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes has been found in vitro and in vivo, this metabolite has not been found from AAII as yet. Therefore, the present study has been designed to compare the amenability of AAI and AAII to oxidation; experimental and theoretical approaches were used for such a study. In the case of experimental approaches, the enzyme (CYP)-mediated formation of AAIa from both carcinogens was investigated using CYP enzymes present in subcellular microsomal fractions and recombinant CYP enzymes. We found that in contrast to AAI, AAII is oxidized only by several CYP enzymatic systems and their efficiency is much lower for oxidation of AAII than AAI. Using the theoretical approaches, such as flexible in silico docking methods and ab initio calculations, contribution to explanation of these differences was established. Indeed, the results found by both used approaches determined the reasons why AAI is better oxidized than AAII; the key factor causing the differences in AAI and AAII oxidation is their different amenability to chemical oxidation. Graphical abstract: KEYWORDS: Enzymes; High pressure liquid chromatography; Molecular modeling; Redox reactions PMID: 29104318 PMCID: PMC5653735 DOI: 10.1007/s00706-017-2014-9 Free PMC Article