Friday, 29 June 2018
Pulses raised as new study reveals secrets of the plant that keeps people calm
https://www.jic.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2018/06/chemical-secrets-plant-keeps-people-calm/#
Chemical secrets of a plant used throughout history for its calming effects have been revealed in new research.
These new findings came from research into Indian Snakeroot (Rauwolfia serpentina) which has been used for millennia in South and South East-Asia as a tranquilizer.
Calming influence - chemistry unlocked in Indian Snakeroot (Rauwolfia serpentina) The John Innes Centre team in the lab of Professor Sarah O’Connor followed clues from the recent past to identify the genetic networks behind a critical catalyst called a sarpagan bridge enzyme.
This generates an important chemical link to medicinally useful compounds in Indian snakeroot and many other plants.
Lead author of the paper Dr Thu Thuy Dang of the John Innes Centre said: “We set out to find the missing enzyme that catalyses this important reaction based on a 20-year-old clue from the literature.
”Thanks to the new advancements in bioinformatic and biological chemistry approaches, we were able to identify the missing gene that encodes the enzyme among thousands of other genes from the plant."
The discovery of the new oxidative enzyme that catalyzes intriguing chemistry could deliver faster routes to treatments for abnormal heart rhythms, high blood pressure and some mental disorders.
The study also found that the enzyme has an adaptable mechanism that could create a suite of structurally diverse chemical products.
Prof. Sarah O’Connor added: “The discovery of the sarpagan bridge enzyme, together with other scaffold generator enzymes, will provide the parts necessary for assembling and engineering of metabolic pathways in organisms such as yeast or tobacco plants for mass production of pharmaceutically important compounds. We are currently collaborating with experts in synthetic biology and yeast engineering to push this forward.”
Indian snakeroot is one of the 50 fundamental herbs used in traditional Chinese medicine, where it has the name shégēn mù (Chinese: 蛇根木) or yìndù shémù (Chinese: 印度蛇木).
It produces approximately 150 monoterpene indole alkaloids such as reserpine, yohimbine, and raubasine.
One of the best-known alkaloids in snakeroot is ajmaline, a class Ia antiarrhythmic agent often used in diagnosis of patients suspected of having Brugada syndrome, a condition that causes disruption to the heart's normal rhythm.
In other findings the study showed that the sarpagan bridge enzyme bridges two carbon atoms, a reaction particularly challenging for synthetic organic chemists, and so creates the complex three-dimensional structures found in the many class of alkaloids.
The study also demonstrated for the first time that the complex alkaloid vinorine can be produced in a different organism, requiring five enzymatic steps (including the newly discovered enzyme) from the readily available intermediate strictosidine.
Ultimately, this approach might be used to produce strictosidine-derived drugs such as ajmaline, which is used to treat abnormal heart rhythms, more efficiently.
Dr Jakob Franke said “The discovery highlights the versatility of this group of oxidative enzymes, which makes it a very useful biocatalyst and an excellent target for engineering these alkaloid pathways. We could use this enzyme to produce drugs in a much more elegant way than any synthetic chemist could.”
The full paper can be found in Nature Chemical Biology
Brief Communication | Published: 25 June 2018
Sarpagan bridge enzyme has substrate-controlled cyclization and aromatization modes
Thu-Thuy T. Dang, Jakob Franke, Ines Soares Teto Carqueijeiro, Chloe Langley, Vincent Courdavault & Sarah E. O’Connor
Nature Chemical Biology (2018) | Download Citation
Abstract
Cyclization reactions that create complex polycyclic scaffolds are hallmarks of alkaloid biosynthetic pathways. We present the discovery of three homologous cytochrome P450s from three monoterpene indole alkaloid-producing plants (Rauwolfia serpentina, Gelsemium sempervirens and Catharanthus roseus) that provide entry into two distinct alkaloid classes, the sarpagans and the β-carbolines. Our results highlight how a common enzymatic mechanism, guided by related but structurally distinct substrates, leads to either cyclization or aromatization.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
1.
O’Connor, S. E. & Maresh, J. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 23, 532–547 (2006).
Article
Google Scholar
2.
Cragg, G. M. & Newman, D. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1830, 3670–3695 (2013).
Article
Google Scholar
3.
Namjoshi, O. A. & Cook, J. M. Alkaloids Chem. Biol. 76, 63–169 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
4.
Hashimoto, Y., Hori, R., Okumura, K. & Yasuhara, M. Br. J. Pharmacol. 88, 71–77 (1986).
Article
Google Scholar
5.
Zhang, X. et al. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 72, 411–416 (2015).
Article
Google Scholar
6.
Jin, G.-L. et al. J. Ethnopharmacol. 152, 33–52 (2014).
Article
Google Scholar
7.
Schmidt, D. & Stöckigt, J. Planta Med. 61, 254–258 (1995).
Article
Google Scholar
8.
Tatsis, E. C. et al. Nat. Commun. 8, 316 (2017).
Article
Google Scholar
9.
Góngora-Castillo, E. et al. PLoS One 7, e52506 (2012).
Article
Google Scholar
10.
Dang, T.-T. T., Franke, J., Tatsis, E. & O’Connor, S. E. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn. Engl. 56, 9440–9444 (2017).
Article
Google Scholar
11.
Stapleton, J. A. et al. PLoS One 11, e0147229 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
12.
Yuzurihara, M. et al. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 444, 183–189 (2002).
Article
Google Scholar
13.
Yang, Z. D. et al. Nat. Prod. Res. 26, 22–28 (2012).
Article
Google Scholar
14.
Takayama, H., Watanabe, T., Seki, H., Aimi, N. & Sakai, S. Tetrahedr. Lett. 33, 6831–6834 (1992).
Article
Google Scholar
15.
Ahamada, K., Benayad, S., Poupon, E. & Evanno, L. Tetrahedr. Lett. 57, 1718–1720 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
16.
Corbin, C. et al. Protoplasma 254, 1813–1818 (2017).
Article
Google Scholar
17.
Eckermann, R. & Gaich, T. Chemistry 22, 5749–5755 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
18.
Elisabetsky, E. & Costa-Campos, L. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 3, 39–48 (2006).
Article
Google Scholar
19.
Korytowski, W., Felix, C. C. & Kalyanaraman, B. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 144, 692–698 (1987).
Article
Google Scholar
20.
Blom, T. J. et al. Planta 183, 170–177 (1991).
Article
Google Scholar
21.
Singh, D. et al. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 74, 97–109 (2008).
22.
Payne, R. M. E. et al. Nat. Plants 3, 16208 (2017).
Article
Google Scholar
23.
Younai, A., Zeng, B. S., Meltzer, H. Y. & Scheidt, K. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 54, 6900–6904 (2015).
Article
Google Scholar
24.
Wehrens, R. & Buydens, L. M. C. J. Stat. Softw. 21, 1–19 (2007).
Article
Google Scholar
25.
Lindbo, J. A. Plant Physiol. 145, 1232–1240 (2007).
Article
Google Scholar
26.
Ro, D. K. et al. BMC Biotechnol. 8, 83 (2008).
Article
Google Scholar
27.
Nguyen, D. T. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 16588–16598 (2010).
Article
Google Scholar
28.
Parage, C. et al. Plant Physiol. 172, 1563–1577 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
29.
Valentine, T. et al. Plant Physiol. 136, 3999–4009 (2004).
Article
Google Scholar
30.
Stavrinides, A. et al. Nat. Commun. 7, 12116 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
31.
Guirimand, G. et al. Plant Cell Rep. 28, 1215–1234 (2009).
Article
Google Scholar
32.
Koike, T., Takayama, H. & Sakai, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 39, 1677–1681 (1991).
Article
Google Scholar
33.
Li, L., Chang, Z., Pan, Z., Fu, Z.-Q. & Wang, X. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13883–13888 (2008).
Article
Google Scholar
34.
Miettinen, K. et al. Nat. Commun. 5, 3606 (2014).
Article
Google Scholar
Download references
Acknowledgements
T.T.T.D. is grateful to the EMBO Long Term Fellowship ALTF 739–2015. J.F. gratefully acknowledges DFG postdoctoral funding (FR 3720/1-1). This work was supported by grants from the European Research Council (311363), BBSRC (BB/J004561/1) (S.E.O.) and from the Région Centre, France (BioPROPHARM, CatharSIS grants) (V.C.). We thank E. Poupon and L. Evanno (Univ. Paris-Sud) for their generous gift of polyneuridine aldehyde standard. Rauwolfia serpentina seeds were a generous gift from S. Hiremath, Karnataka University, India. D.-K. Ro (University of Calgary) generously provided pESC-Leu2d. Images of R. serpentina and C. roseus were provided by T. Nguyen (Ho Chi Minh City University of Science). We thank L. Caputi (John Innes Centre) for his assistance in building the homology model of CrAS and RsSBE and L. Hill and G. Saalbach of the Molecular Analysis platform at John Innes Centre for their assistance in metabolic analysis. We are grateful to D. Grzech for her assistance in cloning mutant constructs. We thank R. Hughes and M. Franceschetti (John Innes Centre) for preparing the modified TRBO vector.
Author information
Author notes
These authors contributed equally: Thu-Thuy T. Dang, Jakob Franke.
Affiliations
John Innes Centre, Department of Biological Chemistry, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
Thu-Thuy T. Dang, Jakob Franke, Chloe Langley & Sarah E. O’Connor
Université François-Rabelais de Tours, Biomolécules et Biotechnologies Végétales, Parc de Grandmont Tours, Tours, France
Ines Soares Teto Carqueijeiro & Vincent Courdavault
Contributions
T.-T.T.D., J.F. and S.E.O. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. T.-T.T.D. characterized RsSBE, GsSBE and CrAS in vitro and in vivo, and performed in planta combinatorial assay and analysis. J.F. performed all substrate purification, synthesis and product characterizations. C.L. contributed to N. benthamiana work. I.S.T.C. and V.C. performed VIGS and localization experiments.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Sarah E. O’Connor.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–12, Supplementary Tables 1–4
Reporting Summary
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Publication history
Received
22 September 2017
Accepted
11 April 2018
Published
25 June 2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-018-0078-4
Subjects
BiosynthesisEnzymesNatural productsPlant sciences