twitter

Thursday, 4 June 2015

Rhetoric and reality: Where do women in agricultural development projects stand today? Part 2?Women in agricultural development: some project, programme and policy issues



Agricultural Administration 01/1984; 15(4):223-237. DOI: 10.1016/0309-586X(84)90086-4
ABSTRACT In Part I, an attempt was made to show the extent to which what is at present known about women's rôles in agriculture and related activities has failed to impact on the World Bank which, in terms of its visibility and spending power, tends to set the tone for other donors and national governments. It was argued that most donors and governments have merely added Women in Development (WiD) projects or WiD components to their ongoing activities, changing neither the overall approach nor the content of their ‘mainstream’ projects and programmes. Doing otherwise would involve a profound shift in perspective and transfer of resources. Integration of women to ensure that they enjoy more of the benefits and suffer less of the pains of development would mean looking hard at the relations between family structure and specific economic and institutional arrangements. But, neither the Bank nor most other development institutions as yet have the capacity to adapt policy or practice to the heterogeneity of socio-economic formations, nor the variable place of women within them. However, while it is certainly too early to develop generalisable theories of any utility as guidelines for action, careful field research and evaluation of the ‘lessons of experience’ to date do suggest a series of improved procedures likely to strengthen the terms on which women gain access to development opportunities. Part 2 of this paper looks at a number of these at the project, programme and policy levels