twitter

Saturday, 6 June 2015

The Moralization of Eating Behavior. Gendered Cognitive and Behavioral Strategies

Volume 187, 13 May 2015, Pages 547–552
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PSIWORLD 2014 - 5th edition
Open Access

The Moralization of Eating Behavior. Gendered Cognitive and Behavioral Strategies

Under a Creative Commons license

Abstract

Eating is an essential part of our lives, but its moral implications are rarely investigated. The present paper reviews current psychological trends regarding this topic. Existing academic literature and its implications for future research are discussed. The first part of the review concerns the macro level of analysis, looking at humans’ symbolic relationship with food throughout history. The second part focuses on the individual level of analysis, referring to current psychological investigations, currently focused on three key domains: moral decision-making strategies and adaptations, gender as a moral choice moderator, and social and personality correlates.

Keywords

  • Morality;
  • Cognitive dissonance;
  • Gender;
  • Food;
  • Meat;
  • Vegetarianism;
  • Moral disengagement

References

    • Arganini et al., 2012
    • C. Arganini, A. Saba, R. Comitato, F. Virgili, A. Turrini
    • Gender differences in food choice and dietary intake in modern Western societies
    • Public Health–Social and Behavioral Health (2012), pp. 83–102
    •  | 
    • Baumeister, 2011
    • R. Baumeister
    • Sensuri ale vieţii (Kállay, É., Trans.)
    • ASCR, Cluj-Napoca (2011) (Original work published 1991)

    • Boyle, 2007
    • J.E. Boyle
    • Becoming vegetarian: An analysis of the vegetarian career using an integrated model of deviance
    • (2007) (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Digital Library and Archives (URN etd-05012007-104133)

    • Crain, 2009
    • W. Crain
    • Animal Suffering–Learning Not to Care and Not to Know
    • Encounter, 22 (2) (2009), pp. 2–5

    • Dagevos and Voordouw, 2013
    • H. Dagevos, J. Voordouw
    • Sustainability and meat consumption: is reduction realistic
    • Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 9 (2) (2013), pp. 60–69
    •  | 
    • Dawkins, 1990
    • M.S. Dawkins
    • From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare
    • Behavioral and brain sciences, 13 (01) (1990), pp. 1–9
    • Fessler and Navarrete, 2003
    • D.M. Fessler, C.D. Navarrete
    • Meat is good to taboo. Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes
    • Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3 (1) (2003), pp. 1–40
    • |  | 
    • Heylighen, 1998
    • F. Heylighen
    • What makes a meme successful? Selection criteria for cultural evolution
    • Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Cybernetics (1998) 423-418

    • Knight et al., 2003
    • S. Knight, K. Nunkoosing, A. Vrij, J. Cherryman
    • Using grounded theory to examine people's attitudes toward how animals are used
    • Society and Animals, 11 (4) (2003), pp. 307–328

    • Preece, 2008
    • R. Preece
    • Sins of the flesh: A history of ethical vegetarian thought
    • UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada (2008)

    • Rozin, 2002
    • P. Rozin
    • Human food intake and choice: Biological, psychological and cultural perspectives
    • H. Anderson, J. Blundell, M. Chiva (Eds.), Food selection: from genes to culture., Danone Institute, Levallois-Perret, France (2002), pp. 7–25

    • Ruby, 2008
    • M.B. Ruby
    • Of meat, morals, and masculinity: factors underlying the consumption of non-human animals and inferences about another's character (Master's thesis).
    • (2008) Retrieved from University of British Columbia, cIRcle Information Repository.

    • Sabaté, 2003
    • J. Sabaté
    • The contribution of vegetarian diets to health and disease: a paradigm shift?
    • The American journal of clinical nutrition, 78 (3) (2003), pp. 502S–507S

    • Tester, 1999
    • K. Tester
    • The Moral Malaise of McDonaldization: The Values of Vegetarianism
    • B. Smart (Ed.), Resisting McDonaldization., Sage, London (1999), pp. 207–221
    • Veilleux, 2014
    • S. Veilleux
    • Coping With Dissonance: Psychological Mechanisms That Enable Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Animals (Doctoral dissertation)
    • University of Maine, Digital Commons, Honors College (2014) (Paper 196)

Peer-review under responsibility of the Scientific Committee of PSIWORLD 2014.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +40 264 405337.