twitter

Thursday, 4 June 2015

This article challenges Jared Diamond’s grand narrative of the biogeographic roots of world inequality

Volume 70, June 2015, Pages 274–285

The Biogeographic Roots of World Inequality: Animals, Disease, and Human Settlement Patterns in Africa and the Americas Before 1492


Highlights

This article challenges Diamond’s account of the biogeographical roots of world inequality.
It explores contrasting patterns of human settlement in Africa and the Americas.
It develops alternative hypotheses concerning the role of animals and human diseases.
It shows the scope for a multi-disciplinary research agenda on the Africa–America comparison.
It argues for the importance of reciprocal regional comparisons.

Summary

Building on recent insights from archeology, genetics, and linguistics I challenge Jared Diamond’s grand narrative of the biogeographic roots of world inequality. I argue that this narrative pays insufficient attention to contrasting patterns of human settlement in Africa and the Americas. I develop alternative hypotheses concerning the role of domesticated animals in shaping human disease environments and processes of state formation prior to the Columbian exchange. My overarching objective is to enhance the debate on the deep roots of world inequality by tackling Eurocentric conceptions of world development and exploring the potential of new comparative and multi-disciplinary research perspectives.

Key words

  • world inequality;
  • biogeography;
  • animals;
  • disease;
  • Africa;
  • America