twitter

Monday, 1 June 2015

Universal Health Coverage: A Quest for All Countries But under Threat in Some

Volume 16, Issue 1, Supplement, January–February 2013, Pages S39–S45

Universal Health Coverage: A Quest for All Countries But under Threat in Some

Under an Elsevier user license
  Open Archive

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, health care has been making a growing contribution to population health in many countries. Yet its benefits are still denied to many people worldwide. This article describes how many countries, both developed and developing, have pursued the quest to achieve universal health care. This has been an explicitly political process. In Europe, it emerged from a belief in solidarity, a fear of revolution, and a changing view of the role of the state. In developing countries, progress was more erratic, characterized by debates about the affordability of universal health care, until it was realized that functioning health systems were essential to deliver development goals. Throughout, the United States has been an exception. An analysis of progress toward universal health care, combining a review of existing theories and new empirical analysis, identifies five factors as important: the strength of organized labor and left-wing parties, adequate economic resources, absence of societal divisions, weakness of institutions that might oppose it (such as organized medicine), and windows of opportunity. Having noted the substantial benefits accruing from universal health care, the article concludes with an analysis of how universal health care is under threat in some European countries and a warning about the risks posed by current radical austerity policies.

Keywords

  • global health;
  • health systems;
  • universal coverage

Introduction

Health care is viewed by some as a fundamental right but by others as a tradable commodity. In the course of just over a century, universal health care (UHC) has gone from being an aspiration to a reality in most industrialized countries, but not yet all. Yet for many, especially in the developing world, it remains no more than a dream. For those who have it, never before has it been so insecure.
Before proceeding further, it is necessary to clarify what is meant by UHC. A previous systematic review of the literature found that UHC and universal health care were often conflated, but the former was invoked more frequently when discussing developing countries [1]. Each term, as used by researchers, was found to express five main themes: access to care, coverage, point of entry to the health system, a rights-based approach, and social and economic risk protection. The definition set out by the World Health Organization (WHO) integrates these themes:
Universal coverage is defined as access to key promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative health interventions for all at an affordable cost, thereby achieving equity in access. The principle of financial-risk protection ensures that the cost of care does not put people at risk of financial catastrophe. A related objective of health-financing policy is equity in financing: households contribute to the health system on the basis of ability to pay. Universal coverage is consistent with WHO’s concepts of Health for All and Primary Health Care.
It identifies the health system as a widely agreed upon means (e.g., affordability) for achieving desired ends (e.g., financial risk protection).
This article aims to assess the future of UHC in Europe. Our analysis proceeds as follows: in the first section, we first review a chronological history of how UHC came (or did not) to be. In the second section, we assess the global prevalence of UHC and leading theories that can account for its presence. Finally, having evaluated the social, political, and economic drivers of UHC, we evaluate the implications of changes to these forces over time, particularly in light of the recent global economic crisis, to assess challenges and threats to UHC in developing countries and Europe.