Martin-Carrasco M1,2,3,
Evans-Lacko S4,5,
Dom G6,
Christodoulou NG7,
Samochowiec J8,
González-Fraile E9,
Bienkowski P10,
Gómez-Beneyto M11,12,
Dos Santos MJ13,
Wasserman D14.
- 1Institute of Psychiatric Research, Mª Josefa Recio Foundation (Hospitaller Sisters), Bilbao, Spain. martincarrasco.manuel@gmail.com.
- 2Centro de Investigación en Red Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain. martincarrasco.manuel@gmail.com.
- 3Clinica Padre Menni, Department of Psychiatry, Joaquin Beunza, 45, 31014, Pamplona, Spain. martincarrasco.manuel@gmail.com.
- 4Health
Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry,
King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
- 5PSSRU, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
- 6Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Antwerp University, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
- 7University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
- 8Department of Psychiatry, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
- 9Institute of Psychiatric Research, Mª Josefa Recio Foundation (Hospitaller Sisters), Bilbao, Spain.
- 10Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
- 11Centro de Investigación en Red Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
- 12University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
- 13Portuguese Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Beatriz Ângelo Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
- 14National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
This
European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance paper is a result of
the Working Group on Mental Health Consequences of Economic Crises of
the EPA Council of National Psychiatric Associations. Its purpose is to
identify the impact on mental health in Europe of the economic downturn
and the measures that may be taken to respond to it. We performed a
review of the existing literature that yields 350 articles on which our
conclusions and recommendations are based. Evidence-based tables and
recommendations were developed through an expert consensus process.
Literature dealing with the consequences of economic turmoil on the
health and health behaviours of the population is heterogeneous, and the
results are not completely unequivocal. However, there is a broad
consensus about the deleterious consequences of economic crises on
mental health, particularly on psychological well-being, depression,
anxiety disorders, insomnia, alcohol abuse, and suicidal behaviour.
Unemployment, indebtedness, precarious working conditions, inequalities,
lack of social connectedness, and housing instability emerge as main
risk factors. Men at working age could be particularly at risk, together
with previous low SES or stigmatized populations. Generalized austerity
measures and poor developed welfare systems trend to increase the
harmful effects of economic crises on mental health. Although many
articles suggest limitations of existing research and provide
suggestions for future research, there is relatively little discussion
of policy approaches to address the negative impact of economic crises
on mental health. The few studies that addressed policy questions
suggested that the development of social protection programs such as
active labour programs, social support systems, protection for housing
instability, and better access to mental health care, particularly at
primary care level, is strongly needed.
KEYWORDS:
Depression; Economic crisis; Europe; Mental health; Psychiatric care; Suicide; Unemployment; Welfare system
- PMID:
- 26874960
- [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
-