Volume 52, July 2015, Pages 642–658
Unemployment scarring by gender: Human capital depreciation or stigmatization? Longitudinal evidence from the Netherlands, 1980–2000
Highlights
- •
- Unemployment scarring is prevalent in the Netherlands, with about 15% among women and 18% among men.
- •
- The mechanisms underlying unemployment scarring differ among men and women.
- •
- Among women, scarring effects are short-lived and arise mainly due to human capital depreciation.
- •
- Among men scarring is driven by stigma and contingent upon age, ethnicity, and economic conditions.
Abstract
Using
longitudinal data from the Dutch Labor Force Supply Panel (OSA), this
article examines how unemployment scarring (i.e., wage setbacks
following unemployment) and its underlying mechanisms operate across
gender in the Netherlands over the period 1985–2000. A series of fixed
effect panel models that correct for unobserved heterogeneity, reveal a
notable disparity in unemployment scarring by gender. Interestingly,
while unemployment scarring is short-lived and partly conditional upon
human capital differences among women, it is strongly persistent among
men and contingent upon old age, ethnicity, and tight economic
conditions. Our findings provide new evidence regarding unemployment
scarring by gender while they support the hypothesis that among women
the effects of unemployment scarring are predominantly driven by human
capital depreciation, while among men stigma effects dominate.
Keywords
- Unemployment scarring;
- Gender;
- Stigma;
- Human capital depreciation;
- Wage inequality
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.