(Review)
Department of Legal Studies and Business Ethics, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3730 Walnut St, United States
Abstract
This essay provides a critical overview of the debate about corporate moral responsibility (CMR). Parties to the debate address whether corporations are the kinds of entities that can be blamed when they cause unjustified harm. Proponents of CMR argue that corporations satisfy the conditions for moral agency and so they are fit for blame. Their opponents respond that corporations lack one or more of the capacities necessary for moral agency. I review thearguments on both sides and conclude ultimately that what divides the two is not so much competing conceptions ofthe corporation as it is disagreement about what moral agency requires. Homing in on the real site of contention will, it is hoped, allow future participants in the debate to focus their efforts more productively. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN: 17479991Source Type: Journal Original language: English
DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12293Document Type: Review
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Sepinwall, A.J.; Department of Legal Studies and Business Ethics, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3730 Walnut St, United States; email:sepin@wharton.upenn.edu
© Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.