twitter

Thursday, 7 May 2015

Re: Green Tea and Hibiscus (Sour Tea) Consumption Improves Insulin Resistance and HDL-C Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

  • Green Tea (Camellia sinensis, Theaceae)
  • Hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa, Malvaceae)
  • Type 2 Diabetes
Date: 05-15-2015 HC# 111436-520

Re: Green Tea and Hibiscus (Sour Tea) Consumption Improves Insulin Resistance and HDL-C Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Mozaffari-Khosravi H, Ahadi Z, Fallah Tafti M. The effect of green tea versus sour tea on insulin resistance, lipids profiles and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2014;39(5):424-432.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common chronic metabolic disease worldwide.1,2 Clinical trials have shown that oxidative stress is involved in the development of complications of the disease. Decreasing oxidative stress and insulin resistance might lower the incidence and severity of those complications. Green tea (Camellia sinensis, Theaceae) leaf and hibiscus (sour tea; Hibiscus sabdariffa, Malvaceae) calyces both contain flavonoids and various polyphenols that have antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties. The goal of this randomized, controlled trial was to compare the effects of hibiscus tea and green tea on insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes.
The study was conducted at the Yazd Diabetic Research Centre at the Faculty of Health at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in Yazd, Iran, during 2011-2012. Patients were nonsmokers, aged 30-60 years, with a fasting blood sugar (FBS) between 80 and 250 mg/dL. They had no obvious diabetes complications, no history of using dietary supplements during the preceding 6 months, and no history of organ disease. All had diabetes for a minimum of 5 years and were non-insulin dependent.
The 100 eligible patients were randomly assigned into either a green tea (GT) or hibiscus tea (ST) group, with 50 in each group. All patients were given a specified number of labeled tea packets, advised to prepare the tea at home according to instructions, and instructed to drink 150 mL tea 3 times daily (2 hours after meals) for 4 weeks. No information regarding either tea is provided in the article. The patients were asked to follow these additional guidelines – drink the entire 150 mL of tea, avoid drinking any other kind of tea during the trial, and continue their usual physical activity and daily diet, excluding foods containing polyphenols such as chocolate (Theobroma cacao, Malvaceae) and coffee (Coffea spp., Rubiaceae).
During the trial, patients were asked about allergic reactions or adverse side effects caused by the tea. Compliance was determined by the percent of unused teabags.
At baseline and after 4 weeks, demographic, anthropometric, and 24-hour dietary recall data were measured. Overnight fasting blood samples were drawn to measure FBS, fructosamine, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), fasting blood insulin, and serum malondialdehyde (MDA). Insulin resistance was assessed using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), the level of beta-cell function (b%), and insulin sensitivity (S%).
Of the 100 patients, 94 completed the trial. Four patients in the ST and 2 in the GT groups dropped out because of allergy to the specified tea, reluctance to continue in the clinical trial, travel, and/or being unable to tolerate the taste of the tea. Compliance rates were 89% in the ST and 91% in the GT groups.
The authors report that the mean FBS, fructosamine, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LCL-C, and MDA levels did not change significantly within or between the groups during the trial. The mean HDL-C increased significantly in both groups, but no between-group differences were noted before or after the intervention.
Mean S% showed no between-group differences at baseline but significant differences were seen in the GT group (96 ± 45.3) compared with the ST group (70 ± 34.1) after 4 weeks (P=0.002). The mean S% before and after intervention showed no significant difference in the GT group. However, in the ST group, a significant decrease was seen compared with baseline values (P<0.001). Mean MDA levels showed no between-group differences before or after the treatment.
The median fasting insulin in the GT group decreased significantly (from 8.5 to 6.6 μIU/mL, P=0.04), but in the ST group, a significant increase (8.2 to 16.3 μIU/mL; P<0.005) was observed. Although the between-group difference was not significant at baseline, a significant difference was observed after 4 weeks (P=0.005). The median HOMA-IR after 4 weeks in the GT group was lower than in the ST group (1.1 vs 1.6; P=0.004). In the ST group, the median HOMA-IR index increased significantly after 4 weeks of intervention (P=0.002). In the GT group, no significant change was observed.
The mean b% level increased significantly in the ST group (from 38.2% at baseline to 47.7% at 4 weeks; P=0.023), but no significant changes were seen in the GT group. The mean S% showed a significant decrease in the ST group but not in the GT group after the intervention.
The authors state that earlier studies have yielded conflicting results concerning the effects of green and hibiscus teas on HDL-C and FBS. In this study, drinking the hibiscus tea and green tea infusions 3 times daily for 4 weeks had positive effects on insulin resistance and HDL-C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the authors admit that the study is limited by the short test period and lack of a control group. They recommend additional studies be carried out with a control group and longer consumption period.
Shari Henson
References
1Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(1):4-14.
2Azimi-Nezhad M, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Parizadeh MR, et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Iran and its relationship with gender, urbanisation, education, marital status and occupation. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(7):571-576.