twitter

Saturday, 19 December 2015

Convenient meat and meat products. Societal and technological issues

Volume 94, 1 November 2015, Pages 40–46
Convenience Foods: Schopping, Cooking & Eating

Highlights

Meat and meat products have been and still are at the heart of convenience trends.
The historical drivers for convenience were identified, as well as their evolution.
Contemporary convenience requirements for (urban) populations were explored.
Reduction of mental investments has become crucial (e.g., concealment of slaughter).

Abstract

In past and contemporary foodscapes, meat and meat products have not only been following convenience trends, they have been at the heart of them. Historically, the first substantial demands for meat convenience must have been for the outsourcing of hunting or domestication, as well as slaughtering activities. In its turn, this prompted concerns for shelf-life stabilisation and the development of preservation strategies, such as meat fermentation. Demands for ease of preparation and consumption can be traced back to Antiquity but have gained in importance over the centuries, especially with the emergence of novel socio-cultural expectations and (perceived) time scarcity. Amongst other trends, this has led to the creation of ready meals and meat snacks and the expansion of urban fast food cultures. Additionally, contemporary requirements focus on the reduction of mental investments, via the “convenient” concealment of slaughtering, the optimisation of nutritional qualities, and the instant incorporation of more intangible matters, such as variety, hedonistic qualities, reassurance, and identity. An overview is given of the technological issues related to the creation of meat convenience, in its broadest sense, along with their societal implications.

Keywords

  • Convenience;
  • Meat;
  • Packaging;
  • Shelf-life;
  • Consumer;
  • Slaughter
Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge financial support of the Research Council of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel [OZR, SRP, and IOF projects, and in particular the HOA project ‘Artisan quality of fermented foods: myth, reality, perceptions, and constructions’ (grant HOA21) and the Interdisciplinary Research Program ‘Food quality, safety, and trust since 1950: societal controversy and biotechnological challenges’ (grant IRP2)], as well as from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) and the Hercules Foundation (project UABR09/004). Luc De Vuyst is acknowledged for his critical reading of the manuscript.

Corresponding author.