twitter

Thursday, 7 January 2016

Pasturing in herds following housing in horseboxes induces a positive cognitive bias in horses


Highlights

Cognitive bias gives information about an individual’s affective state
Horses could be trained on a spatial discrimination task
Pasturing and contact to conspecifics induced a positive cognitive bias
Horses have positive cognitive bias once they satisfy their requirements

Abstract

Horses are kept in various housing systems, for example, with conspecifics in horse pens or singly in horseboxes, with or without pasturing. To provide appropriate living conditions for horses, it is necessary to know in which conditions they feel well or unwell. Here, a cognitive bias assessment provides information about an individual’s affective state and its well-being. When a positive affective state prevails, animals tend to judge optimistically in ambiguous situations. When a negative affective state prevails, animals judge pessimistically in unclear situations. In the present study, we trained horses on a spatial discrimination task and evaluated their judgment of ambiguous locations when they had access to pastures and contact to conspecifics versus when they were kept singly in horseboxes. Ten days of pasturing and contact with conspecifics after being kept singly in horseboxes for 6 months induced a positive cognitive bias in the horses. We suggest that horses need to act out certain behaviors like exploration, social interaction, play or grooming to fulfill their needs. After a time in which they were individually in horseboxes without pasturing and access to the herd, they seem to have a positive cognitive bias once they have access to pastures and conspecifics. This positive cognitive bias effect seems to disappear over time, as horses appear to adapt to the circumstances.

Keywords

  • judgment bias;
  • affect;
  • environmental enrichment;
  • well-being;
  • discrimination task;
  • horse
Conflict of interest statement
All authors disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

Correspondence: Anna-Caroline Wöhr, Institute for Animal Welfare, Ethology and Animal Hygiene of the Veterinary Faculty of Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Tel: + 49 (0)89 2180 78 308.