Abstract
Fleas are commonly controlled using commercial insecticides which
are however expensive and inaccessible to resource-limited farmers.
This has resulted in farmers resorting to the use of alternative
remedies that are cheap and socially acceptable. However, information on
the efficacy of these materials on fleas is lacking. The objectives of
this study were to determine potential dermal irritation and efficacy of
selected materials used in the control fleas in free-range chickens.
The materials tested included used engine oil, Jeyes fluid (carbolic
acid 13%), and plant material from Clutia pulchella and Calpurnia aurea.
Distilled water and Karbadust (carbaryl 5%) were used as negative and
positive controls, respectively. A complete randomized design was used
where sixty free-range chickens were allocated to twelve treatment
groups with five chickens each. The chickens were artificially infested
with fleas, which were counted and recorded daily every morning for
seven days. The results show that used engine oil, Jeyes fluid at
(76.8%) and C. pulchella (100%) caused flea reduction in the
order of 100, 99.8 and 85.5% three days post application of test
materials. These reduction was similar to those of Karbadust (carbaryl
5%), a commercial insecticide that had a flea reduction of 100%. C. aurea (100%) and C. pulchella
(75%) showed an efficacy of 75.5 and 60%, respectively. The different
materials tested exhibited variable efficacy on fleas, where in certain
cases it compared well with Karbadust used by farmers. The test
materials did not cause any visible signs of irritation on chickens.
Despite the efficacy of used engine oil and Jeyes fluid, they are
environmental contaminants.
Keywords: External parasites, flea control, skin irritation, used engine oil
African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 12(14), pp. 1716-1721
Keywords: External parasites, flea control, skin irritation, used engine oil
African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 12(14), pp. 1716-1721