Saturday, 23 July 2016

Conflict behavior in elite show jumping and dressage horses

Volume 10, Issue 2, 1 March 2015, Pages 137-146


a  Department of Animal Behaviour, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Postȩpu 36A, Magdalenka, Poland
b  Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Bioengineering, Warmia and Mazury University, Oczapowskiego 2, Olsztyn, Poland
c  School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland 


Conflict behavior (CB) is a response exhibited by animals that experience difficulty coping with mental or physical discomfort and is most often demonstrated as some form of resistance to handling or training cues and/or equipment. In equestrian sport, Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) code of conduct for the welfare of the horse stipulates that ". horses must only undergo training that matches their physical capabilities and level of maturity for their respective disciplines." The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of CB in horses participating in elite equestrian competition. The behavior of 150 horses (N= 100 during show jumping and N= 50 during dressagetop-level competitions) was monitored via FEI TV transmissions. We assessed the occurrence of specific CBs in each horse including head shaking, pulling the reins out of the rider's hands (PR), gaping, and tail swishing (TS) per second during competition. In jumping competitions, the CB occurrence associated with each type of obstacle (fence) was divided by the total number of obstacles of that same type. In dressage competition, CB occurrence associated with a given dressage movement was divided by total time (pooled duration in seconds) associated with the movement. Percentage of the time where each horse presented with low head position and with the nose behind the vertical was also recorded. The data indicated that jumping and dressage competitions differed in the occurrence of studied CB per second of the course or test (head shaking, P= 0.0279; PR, P < 0.0001; TS, P < 0.0001, and gaping, P < 0.0001). In show jumping, PR was most frequent and vertical and combination fences were the more problematic obstacles. In dressage, TS was most frequent, whereas other CBs occurred only sporadically. Although TS was observed significantly more often during the complicated dressage movement phases compared with less complicated movement phases, there were no differences in the occurrence of CB in particular movements within the groups of more and less complicated dressage movement phases. Dressage horses were ridden more often (P < 0.0001) in low head position and with nose behind the vertical compared to show jumping horses. Both the percentage of time with head in low position and the nose behind the vertical were positively correlated (rs= 0.50; P= 0.0002) although there was no relationship between these parameters and the occurrence of CB in either jumping ordressage. However, the high incidence of CB observed in elite jumping and dressage competition suggests that many horses may not be sufficiently prepared for competition in line with the FEI code of conduct guidelines. Clearly, this could lead to welfare concerns for the horses within these equestrian disciplines. Finally, we suggest that the occurrence and/or the extent of CB exhibited by horses participating in elite jumping and dressage sport require further scrutiny in terms of the FEI code of conduct guidelines. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.

Author keywords

Conflict behavior; Dressage; Horse; Show jumping; Welfare

Indexed keywords

Species Index: Animalia; Equidae
ISSN: 15587878Source Type: Journal Original language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.10.004Document Type: Article
Publisher: Elsevier USA

  Górecka-Bruzda, A.; Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Postepu 36A, Poland
© Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.