twitter

Friday, 8 July 2016

Re: Phase 2 Trial Finds Resveratrol Safe and Well Tolerated in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

HerbClip
Laura Bystrom, PhD Mariann Garner-Wizard Shari Henson
Amy Keller, PhD Cheryl McCutchan, PhD Heather S Oliff, PhD
Executive Editor Mark Blumenthal Managing Editor Lori Glenn
Consulting Editors Wendy Applequist, PhD, Thomas Brendler, Lisa Ann Marshall,
Allison McCutcheon, PhD, J. Erin Smith, MSc, Carrie Waterman PhD
Assistant Editor Tamarind Reaves

PDF (Download)
  • Resveratrol
  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Safety
Date: 06-30-2016 HC# 111554-547

Turner RS, Thomas RG, Craft S, et al.; for the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of resveratrol for Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2015;85(16):1383-1391.

Resveratrol is a polyphenol that is a plant response to stress found in the skin of red grapes (Vitis vinifera, Vitaceae) and several types of berries and peanuts (Arachis hypogaea, Fabaceae). In animal models of Alzheimer's disease (AD), resveratrol may reduce some age-related effects. The purpose of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, phase 2 trial was to evaluate the effects of resveratrol in patients with mild to moderate AD. The primary objectives were to assess resveratrol (1) safety and tolerability, (2) effects on AD biomarkers, and (3) pharmacokinetics. Secondary objectives were to examine (1) effects on clinical cognitive, functional, and behavioral parameters; (2) the influence of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype; and (3) effects on insulin and glucose metabolism.
Patients (n = 119, aged > 49 years) with a diagnosis of probable AD by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria were recruited from 26 US academic clinics affiliated with the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS). The trial was conducted from June 2012 to March 2014. Inclusion criteria included a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 14-26 at screening, modified Hachinski Score < 5, normal laboratory values, stable medications for 4 months, and stable use of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine. Excluded patients had non-AD dementia, Down syndrome, sensory impairments precluding participation, pregnancy, contraindication to lumbar puncture or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), microhemorrhages on a recent MRI, diabetes mellitus, were using resveratrol-containing supplements, or had an unsuitable disorder or laboratory finding.
Patients received placebo or resveratrol (synthesized and encapsulated by Aptuit Laurus, Inc.; Kansas City, Missouri [now Catalent, Inc.; Somerset, New Jersey]) for 52 weeks. The dose of resveratrol was escalated by 500 mg every 13 weeks, starting with 500 mg/day and ending with 2000 mg/day. Study visits occurred at screening, baseline, and weeks 6, 13, 19, 26, 32, 39, 45, and 52. Each visit included a review of concomitant medications and adverse events (AEs), physical and neurological examinations, urinalysis, pill count, and blood collections for laboratory, biomarker, and pharmacokinetic analyses. Brain MRIs to measure brain volume were obtained at baseline and weeks 13 and 52. Electrocardiograms (ECGs), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collections, and oral glucose tolerance tests were conducted at baseline and week 52. A subgroup of 15 patients participated in the 24-hour pharmacokinetic studies at each dosage (first dose at baseline and weeks 13, 26, 39, and 52) wherein the plasma and CSF levels of resveratrol, 3-O-glucuronidated-resveratrol (3G-RES), 4-O-glucuronidated-resveratrol (4G-RES), and 3-sulfated-resveratrol (S-RES) were analyzed. Clinical parameters were measured with the MMSE, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog), ADCS Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL), Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).
The AD biomarkers assessed included plasma and CSF levels of amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), Aβ40, tau, and phospho-tau 181. CSF and plasma decreases in Aβ42 are associated with an increase in AD; the lower the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, the greater the cognitive decline. Phospho-tau is associated with the pathogenesis of AD. An increase in tau is associated with AD progression. Therefore, stabilization or an increase in Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, and a decrease in tau and phospho-tau are considered bioindicators of treatment benefit.
A total of 104 patients completed the study, and 77 patients completed 2 CSF collections. The placebo group had a longer duration of AD; otherwise, all baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In regard to safety, there were no significant differences between groups for vital signs, physical examination, or neurologic examination. At least 1 AE was reported by 95% of patients. The most commonly reported AEs were nausea and diarrhea, but the incidence was not significantly different between groups. There were 36 serious AEs, including death, but none were considered treatment-related. Body weight and body mass index decreased in the resveratrol group and increased in the placebo group (P < 0.05); this is considered an adverse effect. The pharmacokinetic results confirmed treatment compliance and proved that resveratrol could cross the blood-brain barrier because resveratrol and its metabolites were found in the CSF.
At study end, the decline in CSF Aβ40 was significantly less in the resveratrol group than in the placebo group (P = 0.002). This difference was found in both APOE4 carriers (P = 0.05) and non-carriers (P = 0.01). There was no significant effect on Aβ42, but the trend was similar to Aβ40 (P = 0.08); subgroup analyses showed a significant treatment effect in APOE4 carriers (P = 0.04) but not in non-carriers. There was no significant effect on CSF tau or phospho-tau 181. Brain volume significantly decreased (P = 0.025) and ventricle volume significantly increased (P = 0.05) in the resveratrol group compared to the placebo group. Brain volume decreased with treatment in APOE4 carriers (P = 0.02) but not in non-carriers. The authors point out that "the etiology and interpretation of brain volume loss observed here and in other studies are unclear, but they are not associated with cognitive or functional decline." The study was statistically underpowered to detect significant changes in clinical outcomes. Accordingly, no significant changes in CDR-SOB, ADAS-cog, MMSE, or NPI scores were detected; however, the resveratrol group had significantly less decline in ADCS-ADL compared with placebo (P = 0.03). There was no effect on plasma glucose or insulin metabolism.
The authors conclude that resveratrol is safe, well tolerated, and alters some AD biomarkers. The study showed that resveratrol and its metabolites can pass the blood-brain barrier, and the biomarker changes suggest central nervous system effects. However, the authors point out these results must be interpreted with caution as they do not provide evidence of therapeutic benefit. Limitations of the study include that it was not sufficiently powered to determine clinical efficacy and that the placebo group had a longer duration of AD.
—Heather S. Oliff, PhD